Away From Me And Identity Return

Since globalization,UNESCO's issue of "preservation and development of human cultural diversity" has promulgated the Convention on the protection of intangible cultural heritage in 2003,UNESCO.This convention is the significant development of the world heritage system and extension,but heritage related research in the world is still an emerging field,belongs to the early stage,but also the field more than ten years in our country,our country related academic heritage protection theory and practice research is also in constant exploration,and work together with all over the world started a campaign of the intangible cultural heritage protection in the wave("intangible protection hot").In theory and practice of complementary,hot once only focus on the relevant academic research has been dubbed the "intangible cultural heritage" label a traditional project itself(especially into the protection list system of the project),and the inheritance people behind the little attention and questions about identity,and this study argues that "the focus of people" is the core of the intangible cultural heritage protection.Against the current of the protection of "intangible" style,this study selected from Guizhou province Rongjiang county "vegetation dye" traditional skills(the body),and to inherit(research subject)-Sichuan Fine Arts Institute of arts and crafts design Pan Hongjia(case),the research object,trying to push the line of sight through the art inheritance case leads back to the core of genetic bearing:people,interpretation skills and research object from a minority areas(private)to "academic" identity transformation(elite)transition.In this sense,art ontology has completed and the traditional agricultural production way of life is closely linked to "live" style(daily)to the official school of "secondary processing"(aesthetic value),on this basis,try to explore our country the influence collisions between art and heritage protection system,both the contradictory ofevaluation system for the demands of genetic bearing main body status is worth our serious reflection.In this study,anthropology of art theory related theory,the protection of non-material cultural heritage research as a guide,and associated with traditional vegetation dyeing craft representative inheritance people as the research object,using the method of anthropological fieldwork to Guizhou province Rongjiang county in watching vegetation dyeing the list of "local knowledge" is how to protect the system from the local existence and development,and through a case of identity transformation case,discusses inheritance person's identity in intangible protection and so on.Article mainly divides into three parts:the first part aims to detail the vegetation dyeing traditional production techniques(the body),carding the definition of clear this art concept,diachronic origin,inheritance development,practical value and artistic aesthetic relationship between each other.The second part through the inheritance people "special identity" in-depth interviews and analysis,interpretation of art itself and the double transition of the research object,and art inheritance subject identity to save and identity("discrete"-"reset").The third part to reflect the folk intangible discourse system of the old identity is "going far away from me"(failure),be badly in need of new identity(return)of the appeal is from official cultural elite art voice control.This to "save" identity and the imbalance of the development of the oppositions between the two is not the case,but now in the process of the heritage protection in China on inheriting the concern about the lack of a common phenomenon,no heritage protection system is the problem that needs to be added and updated.