On Folklore Thinking And National Customary Law

Human wisdom and creation of folk custom,folk life and thinking.The combination of research on cultural phenomena and research of thinking is a demand for expanding and deepening exploration of academic horizons.The task of this paper is to determine the relationship between "folk thinking" and "national habit law" from the two aspects of the definition of "folklore thinking" and the discrimination of the concept of national customary law,and to explore the interlinked relationship between the "folk thinking" and "national habit law" from the synchronic and diachronic aspects.It is revealed that folklore thinking is the inner constructor and designer of the customary law of ethnic minorities,and the national customary law is an important "living law" in the daily life of ethnic minority areas.The essence is the objectification extension of the subject of "folk thinking",which is the creation of folklore thinking,and it can also be said to be the folklore thinking.The material carrier of the dimension corresponds to the state of thinking which is not only relative to the subject of thinking,but also reflects the will of the mind.The general contact that the child is father of the man,thinking and folk custom.In order to accomplish this task,I think at least three requirements:(1)definition and discrimination of the concept,mainly the definition of the concept of folklore thinking,and the differentiation and analysis of folklore thinking and primitive thinking(former comprehensive thinking),the common thinking(after comprehensive thinking)and the habit and habit law.Similarities and differences.(2)taking into account the two aspects of synchronic and diachronic aspects,we should focus on the internal relations between the folklore thinking and the common time of national custom,especially how folklore thinking is reflected in the daily life of the local society through the words and deeds of the main body of thinking,and the value and significance of this way of thinking in the field of customary law;at the same time,it also takes into account the two.The process of diachronic evolution and differentiation.(3)the full empirical evidence,whether it is the use of historical materials of national customary law,or the interpretation of ethnography and national customary law cases,should pay attention to the deep relationship with this topic.