Research On Chinese Negative Evaluative Pragmatic Markers And Its Application In Chinese Teaching

In this paper,negative evaluative pragmatic markers are taken as the research object.On the basis of previous classifications of negative expression structures,and drawing on the highlighting principle of cognitive linguistics,negative evaluative pragmatic markers are further subdivided.In addition,this paper also analyzes the reasons why it is still difficult for advanced Chinese learners to keep up with the level of Chinese native speakers after long-term learning,and provides some teaching Suggestions for teaching Chinese as a foreign language with negative evaluative pragmatic markers.This paper is divided into eight chapters.Chapter one is introduction.From the teaching practice,we find that the Chinese proficiency of the second language learner is still different from that of the native speaker.This difference is often due to the fact that Chinese second language learners cannot use some Chinese idiomatic expressions correctly and freely.Among them,negative evaluative expression is a typical representative.For fear of causing communicative conflict,non-native Chinese learners will avoid using and neglect to master such expressions.This chapter introduces the research motivation,research significance,research methods and corpus sources of this paper.Chapter two makes a simple review and summary of previous studies on negative evaluative pragmatic markers,including the theoretical basis of interactive linguistics.Related theories of style in interactive communication;The definition,characteristics,classification and relationship of discourse markers and pragmatic markers.In chapter 3,based on the previous classification of negative evaluation,the classification is further refined and the classification method of this paper is proposed.Based on bakhtin's theory of speech genre,negative evaluative pragmaticmarkers in monolingual and conversational styles are distinguished.The common negative evaluative pragmatic markers in the alpism are represented by "X's is",and the negative evaluative pragmatic markers in the dialogue are the focus of this paper.From the perspective of grammatical form,fang mei divides negative evaluation constructs into lexical constructs and grammatical constructs.This paper introduces this classification framework into negative evaluative pragmatic markers and divides them into grammatical negative evaluative pragmatic markers and lexical negative evaluative pragmatic markers.In this paper,grammatical negative evaluative pragmatic markers are further refined on the basis of fang mei.According to the salience principle in cognitive linguistics,they are divided into two categories:referential salience and declarative salience.Chapter four discusses in detail the negative evaluation pragmatic markers of referential prominence.The object of the negatively evaluated pragmatic markers highlighted by the referential prominence is mainly human,and has the characteristics of low productivity,limited and non-cyclable.Chapter five mainly discusses the negative evaluation pragmatic markers of declarative prominence.Declaratively highlighting the negative evaluation of pragmatic markers is mainly the action or nature emphasized by the evaluation,which is characterized by high productivity and predictability.Chapter six discusses in detail the basic features of lexical negative evaluative pragmatic markers.Lexical negative evaluative pragmatic markers are mainly grammatical forms that have been solidified into words or phrases.It is characterized by high degree of conventionalization and maneuverability.Chapter seven discusses the teaching strategies of negative evaluative pragmatic markers in teaching Chinese as a foreign language.This chapter analyzes the reasons why it is difficult for advanced Chinese learners to keep up with the Chinese proficiency of native speakers,and then puts forward corresponding teaching Suggestions.Chapter eight is conclusion.In view of this article main viewpoint and the conclusion makes the summary,and proposed this article limitation and to the future prospect.