A Research On Textual Criticism Of Tenghuaxie Version Of Shuo Wen Jie Zi

In this paper,the author makes a word by word comparison between Tenghuaxie version and Song version,analyzes the revised contents,differentiates the right and wrong,classifies the discussion and explores the basis,so as to show the complicated character features of Tenghuaxie version.This paper is divided into six parts.The first chapter summarizes the book and circulation of Shuo Wen,introduces the basic situation of Shuo wen of Daxu version,and emphasizes on the issue of publication,value,basis and the research value of the contents of the reform of Tenghuaxie version.The second,the third,the fourth and the fifth chapters are the main contents of this paper.They mainly refer to the works of previous scholars and make a classified study of the contents of the school reform.First,there are mistakes in the Song version and Tenghuaxie version has corrected them.Tenghuaxie version is mainly based on orthography,style,Jiguge version and other versions of the correction.Second,the Song version is correct and the Tenghuaxie version is wrong.Tenghuaxie version is mainly affected by the errors caused by the printing and other editions such as Jihuge version and Wangchang version.Third,both Tenghuaxie version reform and Song version can be established Tenghuaxie version mainly used variant words,reversed words and synonyms,and the correction part was greatly influenced by Jiguge version.Fourth,there are mistakes in Tenghuaxie version reform and Song version.Tenghuaxie version is mainly influenced by Jiguge version,but also includes two copies which are all near error due to printing.In addition,Tenghuaxie version also mended the Ink block,depicting and blank of the Song version,and also analyzed the taboo words deliberately made by Tenghuaxie version.The conclusion part summarizes the whole paper and explains the basis of Tenghuaxie version.The purpose of this paper is to reveal the complex features of the text of Tenghuaxie version and to raise the attention of scholars to this version.