Criticism Of Nozick's Liberalism

For a long time,the relationship between freedom and equality has been one of the focuses of discussion in the Western philosophical community.Regardless of the liberal supremacy represented by Nozick,or the analysis of Marxist scholars represented by Cohen,Romer,and Nelson,they have carried out in-depth research on this issue,and formed two major foundations on this basis.A long debate between factions.This article is based on the analysis of Marxist standpoint,and aims to reshape and analyze Marxist interpretation of Nozick's liberty supremacy by analyzing Nozick's libertarianism theory and its dilemma,and define and clarify the analysis based on this.The Contributions and Deficiency of Marxism in the Study of Freedom and Equality.The article is divided into four parts:The first part puts forward the difficulties faced by Nozick's theory of equality,starting from the analysis of Nozick's theory of libertarianism,studying the background and main content and characteristics of the theory of libertarianism;clarifying the theory of Nozick's libertarianism Values,comment on the innovation points and theoretical contributions of libertarianism;reveal the theoretical dilemma facing Nozick's libertarianism,and point out that it deviates from the basic position of Marxism and regards freedom as the sole consideration of social justice.In the second part,I criticize Nozick's theory from the perspective of analyzing Marxism.First,I criticize the relationship between libertarianism and equality.This part starts with the two concepts of self-ownership and the principle of self-ownership,analyzes and critiques the basis of Nozick's theory of self-ownership,and refutes the related discussions of self-ownership and equality.Second,criticize Nozick's principle of self-ownership and negate the incompatibility of Nozick's freedom and equality.In the second part,I explained that Marxist scholars criticized Nozick's theory.First,they criticized the relationship between libertarianism and equality.This part starts with the two concepts of self-ownership and the principle of self-ownership,analyzes and critiques the basis of Nozick's theory of self-ownership,and refutes the related discussions of self-ownership and equality.Second,criticize Nozick's principle of self-ownership and negate the incompatibility of Nozick's freedom and equality.The third part is a comprehensive analysis of the analysis of Cohen,Romer and Nielsen's analysis of Marxism's reinterpretation of Nozick's liberal supremacy theory.This theory remodeling includes three aspects: first,the methodological position and equality The reshaping of socialism and radical egalitarianism;second,the reinterpretation of the socialist distribution of justice;the analysis of the results of market socialism and radical egalitarianism;and third,the theory of equality of opportunity and equality of results Reinterpretation,proposed changes from equal access to advantages to absolute equal opportunities,from equal opportunities to equal results.The fourth part,from the analysis of Marxist concept of equality and its development of Marxism,elaborates the theoretical value of Marxism's criticism and remodeling of Nozick's liberal supremacy theory,as well as its own existence.Defects and deficiencies.On this basis,it expounds and analyzes the positive enlightenment of Marxist concept of equality on socialist fairness and justice,social governance,etc.with contemporary Chinese characteristics.