Three Books On "History Of Chinese Music Aesthetics" Compare Research

Since the establishment of the "Chinese Music Aesthetic History" discipline by Mr.Cai Zhongde,the academic history of Chinese music aesthetics has been fruitful.However,due to the nature of his historical research,along with the new discoveries of archeological relics and the perspective of interdisciplinary subjects,he used to look at the "history of Chinese music aesthetics" "Some issues in the discipline have changed so far.The author observes this field of monographs on the history of Chinese music aesthetics and finds that in addition to the more influential Cai Zhongde's "History of Chinese Music Aesthetics",there are also Xiu Hailin's "Ancient Chinese Music Aesthetics" and Gong Nili's "History of Chinese Music Aesthetics" Monographs,however,the influence of these three works is far different.The existence of such a problem does not mean that the latter two monographs are worthless,but because of some non-academic issues.This article is divided into four main parts: The first part mainly compares the research objects of the three authors' works,such as Cai Zhongde's research on the aesthetic consciousness of music as the theoretical form,and Xiu Hailin's practice of the beauty of music as the research object There is a huge difference in their choice of research objects;the second part mainly compares the theoretical systems in the works of the three authors,such as the theoretical system of Cai Zhongde's "humanism" and Xiu Hailin's "music ontology" There is a huge difference in the theoretical system(the practice of music beauty).Cai Zhongde's research is a metaphysical research,while Xiu Hailin's research is a metaphysical research.Gong Nili's research is to combine the research of the previous two authors to carry out the ideological fusion and continuation.The "Three Outlooks" in the author's works are compared and studied.For example,Cai Zhongde's "view of Confucianism and Confucianism" is due to the influence of his life background "May 4th Movement".Xiu Hailin's interdisciplinary view of materials is influenced by his historical outlook and theoretical system,that is,"the practice of the beauty of music".Therefore,in his works,the research basis is in addition to the most basic paper documents,oracle bones,music scores,audiovisual,cultural relics The fourth part is the author's basic knowledge and evaluation of these three works,mainly judging the characteristics and value of writing.Through comparative research,the author finds that all three books have narrative writing characteristics,and show examples of argumentation,citation argumentation,comparative argumentation,and metaphorical argumentation in the way of writing expression.In terms of their value,differences are caused by other factors such as the author's social identity,academic background,and speaking position.However,after comparing these three works and comparing them,the conclusions reached are not the same as theirs.The influence matches.The establishment of the discipline of the history of Chinese music aesthetics has created a precedent for the study of Chinese music aesthetics,and its profound and profound ideological sources have caused fellow scholars to linger.After the author's comparative study of these three works,I have gained deeper meaning,but no one monograph can be called perfect.In the discipline "History of Chinese Music Aesthetics",the three monographs only have mutual effects on each other.Combining,tolerating,and even criticizing each other to learn can make the discipline of "Chinese Music Aesthetic History" continue to develop.If our contemporary scholars just tout their previous research,they can't look at and solve problems from different perspectives,then the discipline of the history of Chinese music aesthetics will stagnate.