Study On The Administrative Accountability System Of Emergent Environmental Incidents

The administrative accountability system for sudden environmental incidents means that due to the subjective intentional or negligence of the government,the government environmental protection department,and their public servants causing an unforeseen environmental incident,they do not perform or fail to properly perform their statutory duties and obligations.They bear some kind of negative consequences of the accountability system.Since the opening of the administrative accountability system for environmental emergencies in China in 2003,certain achievements have been made in legislation and practice,and certain experiences have been accumulated.The following are specific:the administrative accountability for emergencies of environmental incidents is increasingly normal.the administrative accountability system for sudden environmental incidents has gradually improved.the role of the public and the media in the administrative accountability for environmental emergencies cannot be underestimated.However,there are the following problems in the system of accountability for environmental emergencies in China:the principle of accountability for accountability is unclear,and the principle of imputation is simple;the supervision of consortium accountability is not in place;the object of accountability Interim powers and responsibilities are not clear.the accountability process is not specific and non-standard.the scope of accountability is more general and abstract.the accountability results are simple.related supporting mechanisms are not perfect,such as open government information.Insufficient,lack of relief mechanisms.The existence of these problems is not conducive to the development of administrative accountability for environmental incidents in China.To improve the system of administrative accountability for environmental emergencies in China,the Basic Law on Environmental Administrative Accountability or related laws and regulations can be formulated.The following aspects can be specified:implement the principle of accountability accountability and construction The system of liability imputation based on the principle of fault liability;strengthen the supervision of consular accountability entities,in particular,strengthen the supervisory role of the people's congress,the news media and the public,and promote the standardization of accountability subjects;third,ask clearly Responsibility for the relationship between the object,specifically to clear between the party and government,between the government and the environmental protection department,the environmental protection department and between the various levels of government between the power and responsibility relations;the development of specific and feasible accountability procedures will be sudden The procedures for administrative accountability for environmental incidents are stipulated as case filing,investigation,decision,execution and relief;the scope of accountability is further defined so that the scope of accountability can be specifically quantified;the results of accountability are enriched and different questions are asked responsibility for the convergence of results;improve the relevant supporting mechanisms,including information disclosure mechanisms and relief mechanisms.