The Predicament And Countermeasure Analysis Of The Pluralistic Co-Governance Of Ruralliving Environment

From the new rural construction proposed at the fifth plenary session of the 16 th CPC central committee to the rural revitalization strategy proposed in the report of the 19 th CPC national congress,the connotation of rural residential environment is undergoing profound changes.The environmental requirements have changed from "clean village appearance" to "ecological livability",with more emphasis on the durability of rural residential environment.At present,China's rural living environment is under great pressure,with many historical debts and high governance costs.The capital input of the municipal and county governments is far from enough to meet the input of the township governments in improving the living environment.In addition,the unilateral administrative actions of township governments are generally not understood or supported by rural residents.The coordination between the masses and the government is low and the administrative efficiency is low.Therefore,it is not enough to rely on the government to govern the rural residential environment.The governance of rural residential environment needs the joint participation of the government,enterprises and farmers to realize multiple governance,which has become the current focus of grassroots governance.But at the grassroots level,in the process of adopting the multiple work pattern appeared is not smooth,if the masses to participate is low,lack of public awareness,the government,society and enterprises there is a gap,the interests of the parties to the masses,unable to reach a consensus on issues such as,the lack of an effective platform and channel to express their own opinions,can both solve the problem of public,and resolved to make their own interests,to achieve the effect of seeking common ground while putting aside differences.Based on Xinxiang city S town as an example,this paper analysis the villages and towns in promoting the rural residential environment multivariate problems and difficulties in the process of the work,analyzes the reasons of the existence of problems,and combined with the domestic other areas in the advanced experience of rural living environment governance practices,put forward by promote the research perspective of deliberative democracy at the grass-roots level,through promoting grassroots democracy in the country negotiation model,Chinese people's political consultative conference(CPPCC)department at the county level shall formulate specific measures of deliberative democracy at the grass-roots level,construct platform for deliberative democracy,organization and coordination by the township government,provide places and arrange time to process,publicity,build atmosphere,improve the grassroots and the enterprise,the enthusiasm of the society participate in,Truly the village,the infrastructure construction and the rural residential environment renovation the vital interests of the public problems as the issue of deliberative democracy at the grass-roots level,according to local actual situation to issue after the review,the living environment of governance work included in the scope of the deliberative democracy at the grass-roots level to participate in make the parties under the township government organization,equal consultation,views,in harmony,to achieve the greatest common divisor,actively and orderly participation to improve rural living environment in the work.The consultation results shall be organized and implemented by the township governments,and the supervision institutions democratically elected by the township or village councils shall effectively supervise the implementation effects of the consultation results,so as to realize the model of government setting up a platform and active participation of all parties in social governance and truly realize the expected effect of multiple cogovernance.This paper attempts to build an effective governance model suitable for improving the living environment of rural areas in north China on the basis of the current grassroots social governance mode and grassroots structure.