On The Countermeasure Of Public Legal Service Platform Construction

The Fourth Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China(CPC)proposed that we should "build a complete legal service system,promote the construction of a public legal service system covering urban and rural residents,improve the legal aid system and improve the judicial assistance system".As an important part of public service,the construction of public legal service system is of great significance and far-reaching influence.In recent years,the public legal service system has attracted much attention and has become a hot issue in the field of public service and legal research.Focusing on the construction of public legal service platform has strong research value and significant practical significance.By combing the relevant research results at home and abroad,this paper analyses the definition,demand and feasibility of public legal services,and expounds the basic structure and main functions.At the same time,combined with the reality of Xiangyang city's public legal service work,the main problems and their causes are analyzed,and countermeasures and suggestions are put forward.The problems and difficulties are mainly concentrated in several aspects:first,the integration of public legal service resources is difficult,and the pressure and urgency of overall promotion are prominent;second,the construction of the system is relatively lagging behind,especially the detailed absence of standardization,standardization and enforceable implementation,and the convergence and integration with the current system and norms need to be improved;third,the grass-roots legal service resources are limited,and there are still some problems.There are serious shortages of professional legal service institutions and personnel,unbalanced distribution of power and unbalanced regional development.Fourthly,poor hardware conditions,poor facilities and serious lack of supporting facilities prevail at the grass-roots level,which affect and restrict the role of public legal services.Fifthly,the safeguard mechanism needs to be strengthened,and there is a lack of systematic supporting measures and financial support.The incentive mechanism also needs to be improved urgently.Sixthly,the assessment and evaluation mechanism is not perfect,the assessment criteria and system are not unified,the assessment principles and methods are not clear,and the assessment results are not open and fully applied.Based on the analysis of the causes of the above problems,the following countermeasures and suggestions are put forward:first,adhere to co-construction and sharing,actively integrate beneficial resources,strengthen the positioning attributes of public welfare services,expand the "judicial administration+" model;second,grasp the top-level design,promote the platform construction according to local conditions at different levels,ensure the unity and standardization;third,increase government investment and strengthen the special financial funds.Guarantee and promote infrastructure construction at the grass-roots level and improvement of supporting conditions;Fourth,highlight the exemplary effect,speed up the construction of service windows and efficient platforms,establish brand effect and quality consciousness;Fifth,optimize service experience,provide high-quality and convenient professional legal services;Sixth,establish a standardized evaluation system,improve service evaluation mechanism,supervision mechanism,and disciplining machine for dishonesty.We should make full use of the evaluation results,accelerate the elimination of the fittest and lay a solid foundation for development.