| The imbalance of regional development,employment trouble,high housing prices,unfair distribution of resources,social security,land issues and others are new risk factors bursting into Transitional China.Those are intangibly leading to the "sense of relative deprivation" of the peasant group and as a result the communication failed when the weak farmer express his benefits individually by the institutionalize channels of interest expression.During the era of "rights" as the mainstream,interests conveyed again with “disobedience” to the government by the union of peasant which affect the rural social order occasionally.The subject need to be further disscusion is What the Relationship between the Expression of Farmers’ Interests and Rural Social Order in the government’s perspective?The paper mainly adopts literature analysis,cases analysis and interviews as research methods,and builds up a close relationship between peasant’ interests,rural social order,government and rules with political system theory.To be a mean of “dispute” directly transformed into peasants’ interests expression representing as request,and then imported into the political system accompanying by the support which is shifting to the higher government,even to central government,The phenomenon of “disobedience” causing partial disorder of countryside appeared in Transitional China,is to gain the power of central government to put pressure on the local government.The process that these interest demand integrated vaguely into Interests Demand of Peasants and the Stability of Rural Social Order by government who take advantage of accumulative experience to respond to the demands and calm down the situation,is called input;As a respond,the government outputs the behavior and decision-making under the logic of "rigidity and stability" formed in the repeated interaction.The technology and the mode of maintaining stability is optimized in the continuous feedback information,however,is still criticized with its "politicization" characteristic.The shunt and integration in the “dark box” is not in an open state,need to be verified by the output process,which showing a hierarchical governance structure of governments and the ecology of Interdependence between central government and peasant groups,it is output.The following conclusions can be drawn from government output and the facts reflected in cases.1.Feedback results in calming the situation and temporarily restoring social order in the countryside,at the cost of suppressing and ignoring peasants’ interests,and its "politicization" characteristic weaken the process of legalization.2.The government output does not stimulate the high level of support input,and some feedback loops operate at a low level.Government-First habitually regards the interests expression of peasants and rural social order as the opposite relationship.3.The interaction between the peasant group and the central government has compressed the space for the central government to evade its responsibilities.The farmers will weaken their support to central government if they recognize it can`t solve their demand,which means that the central government has fallen into a crisis of legitimacy.In view of the above conclusions,the state needs to resolve the legitimacy problems brought about by the long-term interaction with peasants,and regarding as harmonious relationship between interests demand of peasants and rural social order in practice.Specific measures include: optimizing the institutionalized channels of interest expression from the petition,judicial,interest expression platform,and improve maintaining stability mode of government to protect the interests expression of farmers. |
