Research On The Main Mode Of Urban Road Parking Toll In China

Urban public roads have limited space,and road parking spaces are scarce.Due to the increasing number of motor vehicles,road parking difficulties have become a common problem in many large,medium and small cities.Therefore,many cities have begun to charge for road parking.This paper takes the urban road parking fee as the starting point,and takes the urban road parking charging model as the main research object.Firstly,it starts from the road right distribution theory and the public property utilization theory,analyzes the legitimacy of parking charges,and then uses the empirical analysis method.This paper analyzes the implementation status of the three existing road parking charging modes in China,their respective advantages and disadvantages,and puts forward some suggestions for the development of the three modes.The administrative franchise model and the government procurement service model are all manifestations of the government's transformation of governance methods and improvement of governance capabilities in the new era,and belong to different levels of public-private cooperation.The administrative franchise model is a special form of the transfer of management rights.The government procurement service model belongs to a form directly managed by the government.The administrative commission model belongs to the transfer of administrative tasks,but the legal effects are retained.In the urban road parking charges of the administrative franchise model in Wuhan and other cities,there are mainly problems such asinsufficient legal basis for charging behavior,lack of open and transparent licensing procedures,and lack of charging evaluation system after franchising.The article puts forward the following three suggestions: first,to formulate local regulations on road parking charges;second,to hear whether the need for fees,charges,and the legality of the hearing procedure;third,through the administrative licensing agreement The obligation of the franchisee is clearly defined,the benchmark of the discretion of the administrative agency is clarified to regulate the rights and obligations of both parties,and a diversified remedy for litigation should be formed to safeguard the legitimate interests of all parties.In the urban road parking charges of the government procurement service model in Beijing and Guangzhou,there are mainly problems such as insufficient legal basis for charging behavior in some cities,lack of transparency in the collection and payment of fees,and weak supervision of fulfilling procurement service contracts.It can be improved through the following ways: first,to establish local regulations on road parking charges;second,to strengthen the disclosure of charge and receipt information;third,to strengthen the supervision of the entire process of government procurement service contracts,including the improvement of pre-contracts Project review mechanism,establishment of contract project return visit mechanism and strengthening contract project supervision and management mechanism.Among the urban road parking charges in the administrative entrustment mode,there are mainly some cities lacking the legal basis for administrative entrustment,lack of necessary qualification requirements for the entrusted party,and unclear scope of the entrusted party's authority.Entrust matters and set up administrative entrustment procedures.After a detailed analysis of the three models,this paper attempts to compare from a macro perspective,and believes that the administrative franchise model has stronger applicability.