Research On The Dilemma And Countermeasures Of The Grass-roots Market Supervision And Law Enforcement In Heyuan City Under The Background Of Institutional Reform

Since the reform and opening up,in order to meet the needs of the development of the national economic system and social development,and to promote the modernization of the national governance system and governance capabilities,China has carried out seven government agency reforms.In March 2018,the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China issued the "Deepening Party and State Institutional Reform Plan",which launched China's eighth and largest institutional reform to date.Reforming the market supervision system,combining the responsibilities of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce,the State Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine,the State Administration of Food and Drug Administration,the price supervision and inspection and antitrust enforcement duties of the National Development and Reform Commission Operators integrated antitrust law enforcement and the State Council Antimonopoly Committee Office and other responsibilities to integrate and form the State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration.It aims to implement unified market supervision through reform,promote the implementation of the strategy of strengthening the country by quality,and create a market environment of honesty,trustworthiness and fair competition.Institutional reforms have further optimized the institutional and functional settings of market supervision departments.However,in grassroots practice,there are still some deficiencies and defects that affect market supervision and law enforcement.Mainly reflected in:mismatch in human affairs,inadequate ability and quality,low work enthusiasm,unsuccessful collaboration and linkage,and high risk of performing duties at the grassroots level.As we all know,market supervision and law enforcement are concerned about all aspects of production and life safety of the broad masses of the people,which is a key area of great concern to society.Therefore,in-depth analysis of the deficiencies and defects in the grassroots market supervision and enforcement under the background of institutional reforms,to explore practical and effective solutions,and to promote more efficient and smooth grassroots market supervision and enforcement are important issues facing the academic and political circles.This article takes the theme of "Research on the Dilemma and Countermeasures of Grassroots Market Supervision and Law Enforcement under the Background of Institutional Reform",and takes Heyuan City Market Supervision Administration JD Branch as the research object,based on local government public management theory and public sector human resource management theory,using literature research Methods,comparative research methods,empirical research and other methods,through combing the overview of grassroots market supervision and enforcement before and after institutional reforms,combined with the actual situation of the grassroots to explore the root causes of grassroots market supervision and enforcement difficulties after institutional reform.Being problem-oriented,we explore the reasons for the dilemma in terms of personnel turnover,learning conditions,mentality,business ability,and applicability of laws and regulations.On the basis of in-depth analysis,from the aspects of strengthening ideological and political construction,improving the level of business capabilities,optimizing the supervision and enforcement model,rationalizing the division of labor connection mechanism,optimizing and broadening the incentive mechanism,etc.,put forward practical countermeasures and suggestions,in order to build a unified,efficient and authoritative The grass-roots market supervision and law enforcement mechanism system has made a meager contribution.The innovation of this article is to take the district-level market supervision agencies without administrative attributes as the research object,to cite the deeds and cases of grass-roots market supervision and law enforcement personnel to conduct in-depth analysis and research,and put forward targeted countermeasures and suggestions based on the actual work of the grassroots.