Research On Law Enforcement Of Food Safety At The Grass Roots Level

With the development of social productive forces in China,the demand of citizens for food safety and the worrying situation of food safety have become the new main contradiction at this stage.At present,in view of market failure,dislocation of public power,loss of position and many other reasons,food safety accidents threatening citizens’ health constantly appear in the process of food production,processing and operation.The frequent occurrence of food safety accidents,on the one hand,exposes the current food safety situation in China is not optimistic,on the other hand,it also reflects the current domestic food safety grass-roots law enforcement mode is not coordinated with the current stage of society.In view of the professional characteristics of the food industry,food safety law enforcement at the grassroots level is not only a simple administrative act,but also a huge,complex administrative act that needs to introduce more subjects.Only by improving the law enforcement ability of the relevant administrative subjects is not enough to make up for many disadvantages in the food industry,such as the asymmetric information of the administrative subjects,consumers and producers,market failure and so on.Through the empirical investigation,we can find that there are some practical problems in the process of food safety law enforcement,such as the dislocation and loss of administrative power,the lack of law enforcement ability of law enforcement agencies,and the untimely disclosure of relevant government information.On the basis of empirical investigation,this paper explains the connotation of food safety law enforcement at the grass-roots level from the perspective of administrative law,and combines it with the theory of national protection of human rights,market failure theory,information asymmetry theory and public governance theory,so as to find the theoretical basis for solving practical problems.From the perspective of administrative law,this paper combs the historical evolution of China’s food safety grass-roots law enforcement,analyzes the old problems of food safety grass-roots law enforcement in various historical periods,and deeply analyzes the problems faced by contemporary food safety grass-roots law enforcement,such as multiple law enforcement,lag in the construction of law enforcement team,low cost of violation,lack of food traceability system,lack of legal system,lack of legal system and so on Lack of food safety credit system and other practical difficulties and causes.With the help of comparative law,this paper analyzes in detail the centralized and unified law enforcement mode adopted by Germany,the multi department cooperation law enforcement mode adopted by the United States and the quasi judicial law enforcement mode adopted by Japan,and analyzes the operation mode and system advantages of administrative organs in various countries.Based on the advanced experience of Germany,the United States and Japan,combined with the reality of China’s food market,and taking the opportunity of the reform of the state administrative department,this paper analyzes the innovative way to improve the food safety law enforcement on the basis of the theory of national human rights protection and public governance.Through multiple governance,reform the existing law enforcement mode and establish a centralized and unified law enforcement mode.Through the establishment of a new and powerful administrative body in the basic law enforcement of food safety,the improvement of food safety quality standards,the establishment of food traceability system by using "blockchain" technology,the establishment of food safety credit system and other ways,we take various measures to achieve the purpose of improving the basic law enforcement mode of food safety and provide path support for improving the basic law enforcement level of food safety.