A Comparative Study On Basketball Players' Development Of Explosive Force In Lower Limbs With Resistance Training Of Single And Double Feet

Purposes: the study on subjects were randomly assigned to different load resistance training on one foot,feet resistance training experiment,the different load by means of two groups of basketball special students compare lower limbs explosive power level before and after the training,trying to find out with the development of the basketball students the best way to lower limbs explosive power.Study method: 12 students of Beijing sports university basketball were selected randomly into 2 groups,which were the experimental group and the control group.The experimental group underwent 10 weeks of single-foot resistance training,and the control group underwent 10-week leg resistance training.The training time was 3 times per week.Before training,the athletes were given basic information and physical quality collection,training 5 weeks,and 10 weeks to participate in the physical quality collection of the athletes participating in the experiment.After the test was completed,the test data were statistically analyzed,and the comparison of which training methods was better for the athletes' physical quality was better,and the increase was mainly in the first five weeks or the last five weeks.Research results: 1.Through the training for 10 weeks,the experimental group and control group in the five indicators of test(standing long jump test,in-situ vertical jump,run one foot high touch,three-quarters site sprints testing,high step run-up to touch test)were showing significant differences,and five tests are increased considerably,that these two kinds of training methods have a significant effect.2.By 10 weeks of training,the training method than using controls training method,standing long jump test scores,in situ vertical jump test scores,run-up touch on one foot high test scores,sprints three-quarters field test scores and one step approach to touch high test scores to increase more,and increase the result experimental group and control group,significant differences between so that the experimental group training method is more effective.3.In the ten weeks of training cycle,five weeks after all the test project indicators show that the growth rate of more than five weeks ago,so you can determine the two different kinds of training methods for the influence of five different test scores are mainly concentrated in the five weeks,after comparison,standing long jump test in the last five weeks can be determined,the experimental group than the control group increased faster,shows that the experimental method the effect is more obvious;In the first five weeks,the experimental group increased faster than the control group,indicating that the experimental group method was more effective.In the last five weeks,the experimental group increased faster than the control group,indicating that the experimental group method was more effective.In the last five weeks,the experimental group increased faster than the control group,indicating that the experimental group method was more effective.In the last five weeks,the experimental group increased faster than the control group,indicating that the experimental group method was more effective.Research conclusions: 1.With one leg weight training to improve athletic performance of lower limbs explosive power,standing long jump run-up jump on one foot,in situ vertical jump,step run-up to touch the performance and high ability to accelerate the running of short distance three-quarters of field sprint athletes better than legs weight training at the same time.2.The training effect of the latter part of the whole training cycle was significantly increased compared with that of the first half of the training cycle.