| In the past,a lot of studies have used the ultimatum game to prove that human beings do have a tendency to pursue fairness,and show an aversion to inequity.When it comes to unfair treatment,the pursuit of fairness drives people to punish each other at the expense of their own economic interests,thus achieving a fair goal.In recent years,it has been found that social class has an important influence on individual’s sense of fairness and behavior.The concept of wealth or money is one of the important characteristics of social stratum,and the influence of different classes has not yet formed a unified conclusion.In addition,time pricing refers to the use of money to measure time,and more economic psychological stereotypes that use the concept of money affect individual behavior.But research on time pricing and fairness is relatively rare.Therefore,this paper first examines the relationship between subjective,objective social class and fair perception at the level of self-perception.Then,the study of time pricing as a financial clue to the high,low social class fairness perception of the impact.Finally,on the level of behavioral and psychological mechanism,the influence of individual economic psychology on fair decision is investigated.In this study,The relationship between the subjective social class and the fair perception of college students is investigated.160 freshmen from 18 to 22 years old were randomly selected in Sochow university.Questionnaires were distributed in the classroom,and 153 valid questionnaires were analyzed and processed.The results showed that the subjective and objective social stratum are significant,but the fairness perception.The contribution of the subjective class to the perception of fairness is greater,indicating that the self-perceived social class is more predictable.Study of 2,138 subjects from 18 to 27 years old were randomly selected in Suchow university,through professional magic tour start way subjective social class is divided into high and low,the participants in each group were randomly divided into again time to start pricing group and control group,time pricing on the influence of different subjective social class college students fairness perceptions.The results showed that the main effect of time pricing was significant.Compared with the control group,the time pricing startup group felt higher social equity.Moreover,the interaction effect of the subjective class and time pricing was significant,and the social equity was more felt in the time pricing starting condition than the non-startup group.In the study of 3,with the help of ERP technology,the selection of Suchow university,non-psychological or non-economic major was 34(male 12,female 22),and the age was between 19 and 25.All subjects were right-handed,with normal vision or corrected visual acuity,without brain injury or psychiatric history.The influence of money concept and time pricing on college students’ fair decision making is investigated in the process of time.It is found that the main effect of the starting and time pricing on the concept of money is not significant,and the time pricing shows the psychological setting with money starting.Individuals are more likely to reject a self-loss plan and need more response time than the self-benefit distribution.In terms of EEG data,it was found that in either way,the fair condition obtained the greater P2 and the individual was more concerned with fairness.In the prefrontal area,when fairness triggers a larger P300,individuals tend to associate fairness with the self. |