An Experimental Study On The Impact Of Social Expectation On Social Responsibility

The definition of responsibility and responsibility will be different because of the goal pursued by people and the perspective of research,so the definition of responsibility in academic circles is not uniform.Professor Lu Jiamei,a famous psychologist,defines responsibility through two important factors: the first is the responsibility,the second is the courage to undertake and strive to complete it.In this paper,the definition of social responsibility is an extension of Professor Lu Jiamei's definition: we think that social responsibility is an emotion in which individuals are responsible for what they should do and try their best to accomplish.Social responsibility is an emotion,that is,an implicit emotional experience.Therefore,it is impossible to observe or measure directly.Then in order to explore the sense of social responsibility,we must investigate the sense of social responsibility according to the specific behavior,emotion and EEG indicators in a certain situation.There are many influencing factors of responsibility in previous studies,but most of them are discussed theoretically or investigated by questionnaire.This paper makes an empirical study on the expectation degree of roles(Yu Xiqin,2011),which is an influencing factor of manipulation responsibility.In previous studies,it is through theoretical discussion that the degree of expectation of roles plays a positive role in promoting individual responsibility,so in this paper,It will further explore whether social expectation has a positive impact on college students' sense of social responsibility.The first study is to explore whether social expectation has a positive impact on college students' sense of social responsibility through specific behavioral decisions in a specific situation.First of all,we use the responsibility conflict situation written by Ding Qiang(Ding Qiang,2015)and then add social expectation to the situation.Then,through the way of collective test,the questionnaire is distributed in the classroom.The questionnaire is divided into social expectation situation and non-social expectation situation through different question situations,and then the subjects are asked to judge the decision-making tendency in the situational test.401 college students were randomly divided into two groups: social expectation questionnaire and non-social expectation questionnaire.The results show that,The main effect of social expectation should be significant,and when there is social expectation,the choice tendency of subjects with social expectation is more responsible than that of subjects without social expectation.The results of experiment 1 preliminarily verify that social expectation has a positive impact on social responsibility at the behavioral level.The second study is to further verify the positive impact of social expectations on college students' sense of social responsibility through a simple gambling paradigm at the electrophysiological level.The subjects were 20 college students.Gambling task paradigm was used to investigate the electrophysiological data of the subjects in the situation of social expectation responsibility and no social expectation.At the end of the experiment,the subjects were also required to fill out a subjective assessment questionnaire according to their mood at that time.The results of the second study show that the P300 in the situation without social expectation is significantly higher than that in the situation with social expectation,the P300 in the case of winning money is significantly higher than that in the case of losing money,and the amplitude of FRN in the situation with social expectation is significant.Larger than the situation without social expectation,the amplitude of FRN when losing money is significantly larger than that when winning money.In previous studies,P300 was related to emotional experience and result titer.In this study,positive feedback,that is,winning money,induced a larger P300,which was consistent with the relationship between P300 and result titer(2009,Zhang Huijun).According to the previous studies,the stronger the sense of responsibility experience,the more negative the amplitude of FRN,so the result of study 2 is to induce a larger FRN amplitude in the situation of social expectation responsibility,that is to say,the social responsibility of the subjects with social expectation situation is stronger.This is electricity,too.The physiological level verifies that social expectation has a positive impact on social responsibility.Through the above two studies,we have explored the influence of the social expectation on the social responsibility of the college students at the behavior and the electrophysiology level,respectively.In the first one,we have a positive impact on the social responsibility of the college students at the behavioral level.In that context of social expectation,it is more prefer for the society to be responsible for social responsibility conflict situations.In the second two,we have verified that the social expectation has a positive effect on the social responsibility of the college students through the simple gambling paradigm.The results show that there is a social expectation of the situation of the responsibility to induce the amplitude of the FRN to be tested.