A Comparative Study Of The Sustained Competitive Advantages Of Subjective Scoring And Objective Projects In National University Games

In sports competitions,the continued competitive advantage plays a very important role in the sustainable development of the team.Teams with a sustainable competitive advantage can get more investment,better echelon construction,and often win more in the next game;teams losing their competitive advantage may face greater external accountability.Until the destruction of the sports team's sustainable development.This paper applies the theory of sustainable competitive advantage to the performance study of the National University Games,compares and analyzes the persistence differences of the subjective scoring class and objective class project competitive advantage,and initially discusses the factors and reasons that affect the project's sustainable competitive advantage.This paper is based on the background of the topic,asking questions,analyzing the problems and solving the problems in the order and framework.Based on the theory of sustainable competitive advantage,sports performance,subjective and objective projects,the authors of the three major national sports conferences are subjective evaluations.The continuous competitive advantage of classification and objective class projects is the research object.The negative binomial regression,comparative analysis and STATA software are used to empirically analyze the competitive advantages of each participating provinces and cities in the past ten years.Maintaining the status,the impact of the two types of projects on the performance of the participating provinces and cities and the sustainability of the competitive advantage,and the influencing factors of the project's sustainable competitive advantage,in order to supplement the research on the sustainable competitive advantage of large-scale comprehensive sports,for the sports teams participating in the provinces and cities It provides reference for the construction of echelon,the division of participating projects and the adjustment of the proportion of participating projects.It provides reference for promoting the improvement of university reputation,maintaining the university's sustainable competitive advantage and recruiting high-level athletes.The empirical study has self-regressed the total number of medals won by the participating provinces and cities in two types of projects.It is found that the National University Games subjective scoring and objective projects have sustained competitive advantages,but the competitive advantage can only last for two sessions,not like the Olympics.By comparing the regression results of the two types of projects,it is found that regardless of the main and objective projects,the total number of medals in the previous National Games will significantly affect the total number of medals in the current session,but the significance of subjective scoring projects Higher and more sustainable;through multiple regression of multiple control variables,the factors affecting the sustainable competitive advantage of the project are initially discussed.It is found that the host provinces and cities have little influence on the sustainable competitive advantage,and the per capita GDP has no significant advantage to the sustainable competitive advantage.The impact of the accidental discovery of the reputation of participating universities and colleges has an important influence on the project's continued competitive advantage.Finally,based on the conclusions,corresponding suggestions are put forward.