Font Size: a A A

A Analysis Of The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Technical And Tactical Victories And Defeats Between Fan "Fanzhendong" Chentung And LinGaoyuan,Excellent Men Table Tennis Players

Posted on:2021-01-07Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:C H ZhaoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2427330611490269Subject:Physical Education and Training
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In recent years,a group of excellent players after 95 have emerged in the first national table tennis team of China.Fan Zhendong and Lin Gaoyuan are the most eye-catching among the new athletes.They have won various international and domestic important Championships for many times.They have a growing trend in the integral ranking of the international table tennis Federation and become one of the main lineups of men's table tennis team in the Tokyo Olympic Games.However,their achievements fluctuate in international and domestic competitions,and they are still "reversed" and "cold".For the prosperity of the Chinese table tennis team,the author decided to make use of the professional knowledge he had learned for many years and contribute his "humble power" to analyze the technical and tactical advantages and disadvantages of the two.In this paper,literature,video observation,four stage index evaluation and comparative analysis are used to analyze and evaluate the technical and tactical results of the two,so as to provide a reference for helping the two to find out the advantages and disadvantages of the technical and tactical points.Because the technical and Tactical Research on Lin Gaoyuan started in 2016,in order to facilitate the comparison with previous data,this paper selects the major international and domestic competitions that fan Zhendong and Lin Gaoyuan participated in during 2016-2018 as research objects.The "four stage index evaluation method" which is generally accepted by the academic circle of table tennis at this stage is used for technical and tactical evaluation and analysis.Through the above methods combined with the previous research content,the author comprehensively analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of various technical and tactical application results in the competition between Lin Gaoyuan and fan Zhendong,and provides some references for their future training and competition.Finally,the author draws the following conclusions:1.No matter fan Zhendong or Lin Gaoyuan,the scores in the final part of the winning and losing field will be significantly reduced,even lower than the average score,resulting in the situation that the average score rate in the winning and losing field is higher than the loss rate but the game is lost.According to the theory that the ability of psychological pressure regulation affects the technical performance of the athletes in the final game,there is still a certain gap between the two young generals and the top athletes' psychological regulation ability It is easy to lose points continuously and then lose,especially in the negative field "local point" or "key point".2.From the perspective of high-tech benefits,we can find that fan Zhendong is good at forehand attack,and Lin Gaoyuan is good at backhand attack.On the one hand,although the two people are good at different techniques,they have the advantages of high score,low score and high use in both winning and negative fields;on the other hand,the two people's advantage technology has significantly increasedand decreased in the negative field,which means that the opponent will consciously limit the use of the two people's high-efficiency technology,so the two people need to improve the stability practice of the advantage technology.3.Analyze the difference between fan Zhendong and Lin Gaoyuan from the perspective of low technical efficiency: the disadvantage of fan Zhendong and Lin Gaoyuan in losing points focuses on defensive defense technology,which shows high score loss rate and high utilization rate,especially in the "connecting board" where the conversion of attack and defense is more intense,and the score loss occupies the majority of the whole game,so they should focus on strengthening the conversion of the connecting board of attack and defense Practice,especially the connection practice of defense after attack.4.In the overall tactical score structure,the active tactical score benefit composed of offensive technology of fan Zhendong and Lin Gaoyuan is obviously superior to the passive tactical score benefit composed of control and defense technology.In the passive tactical aspect,the performance of fan Zhendong and Lin Gaoyuan in the control and defense tactics the combination of defense after attack need to be improved.Fan Zhendong's tactical advantages are in the receiving and holding phase I,and the tactical disadvantages are mainly in the sending and holding phase II.Lin Gaoyuan's tactical advantage lies in the receiving and launching stages;the tactical disadvantage lies in the stalemate I and II.It can be seen that Lin Gaoyuan is not good at multi board stalemate.5.From the point of view of the number of boards and the analysis of the relationship between technology and tactics,fan Zhendong can find that although fan Zhendong is fast in hitting the ball,the rhythm of attack technology changes singly,so it is easy to make mistakes at the joints.For example,the third board attack technology of fan Zhendong's serving wheel has the highest score advantage technology,but the negative field has become the highest score disadvantage technology,and the third board score is huge in the winning and losing field The difference is the reason of fan Zhendong's evaluation difference.From the point of view of the number of boards and the analysis of the relationship between technology and tactics,we can find that Lin Gaoyuan's batting power is weak,so the average score benefit of the winning and losing field often decreases with the increase of the number of boards,especially when the opponent consciously starts a stalemate in the middle and far platform,which is the reason why the overall performance of Lin Gaoyuan's stalemate is worse than that of the starting and receiving stages.That is to say,fan Zhendong has enough strength but not enough flexibility,so he needs to strengthen the rhythm and combination of batting.Lin Gaoyuan has enough flexibility but not enough strength,so he needs to strengthen the physical quality practice,especially the strength practice related to the hitting in Juantai.and Yuantai.The common point of the two players' worst performance is that the last two boards of the receiving and sending rounds should be paid attention to if they only pass the stage II of the stalemate.
Keywords/Search Tags:Table tennis, fan Zhendong, Lin Gaoyuan, scoring rate, technique and tactics, comparative analysis, four stage index evaluation method
PDF Full Text Request
Related items