Marx's Criticism Of The Proudhon Economics Research Methodology

The methodology of the metaphysical nature of proudhon runs through his whole study of economics.He believes that a truly great economist must be an expert in metaphysics,So in the beginning of the study of economics,proudhon made a hypothesis about the existence of god,which filled his whole theory with the breath of god.He borrowed the concepts of "absolute rationality" and "antinomy" from Hegel which was called universal rationality,and he believed that absolute spirit made economic development and social progress.That led to his research to the idealistic path in the beginning.In view of that historical view of the spirit,he take the three dialectic law of homing,the three stage theory and the two law in account to get the so-called "higher order" dialectic tool-the dialectic of the series.He summed up a set of the so-called perfect contradiction system which covered economic category and constitutive value in the way of contradictory analysis.Marx's understanding of the distortion of Hegel's thought by proudhon as a basis point reveals the economic theory of proudhon's idealism.He made a scientific understanding and interpretation of political economy,In a critical and established way and opened a new materialist conception of history.The paper contains the following points:First of all,this article has sorted out the text of prouddong's early works What is Title and Philosophy of Poverty from the perspective of the history of thought,and analyzed its research methods in philosophy and political economy from different perspectives.The paper based on a critical examination of ownership of the title,the third class of social morphosis,the inheriting of Hegel's idealism,systematically illustrates how he has a philosophical approach based on the critical examination of ownership.He tried to apply it to the study of political economy,and inherited Hegel's idealist conception of history,dialectics of antinomy to his "serial dialectics".He has ignored social historic precondition and analyzed the various economic fields to get the "orderly" economic contradiction system.In this paper,I expounds the research methods and theoretical results of proudhon's research on economics from the point of view of the transformation from admiration to negation.At the same time,the contradiction between the thought and the reality of proudun was introduced and discussed.The secondly,The paper systematically sorts out and interprets the main contents of Marx's Poverty of Philosophy.As a work in opposition to proudun's Philosophy of Poverty,Marx learnt the full argument from two angles of philosophy and political economics and proudhon controversy.Marx,as a young Hegelian,has already had an in-depth study of Hegel's thought and theory.The paper criticizes the abstract analytical method of Marx's dissociation from the characteristics of Hegel's research.At the some time,the paper reveals that the analysis of the placement,placement and integration of proudun is a reference to the abstract analysis of Hegel's independence from the characteristics of things.Because of his inheritance of Hegel's thought and the misinterpretation of his own source,this theory was strangled in the cradle.First of all,Marx destroyed proudun's attemption that it impose the idealist and pseudo-dialectic theoretical framework obtained in philosophy research into the conception of economic research.He reveals that proudun's use of the series dialectics and the construction of economic category theory are subjective and non-conformable.Then,Marx pointed out the value theory which is “be accommodated” and “be constituted” is actually referenced by David ricardo.The last,Proudhon,as the foundation of the social improvement scheme,will only fall into fantasy and failure.Thirdly,By reading German ideology and Das kapital,we know the relationship between productive forces and social relations?the theory of economic category and production social relations?the development of productive forces and the law of class antagonism?use value and exchange value rule and so on.At the end of paper,it expounds the importance and contemporary value of Marx's transcendence in his theory.