The National Treasury Centralized Payment Reform Of Dynamic Monitoring

Under the market economy,the traditional treasury decentralized payment system is no longer suitable for national conditions,so centralized treasury payment came into being.Strictly speaking,China's treasury centralized payment started in 2001,and dynamic monitoring began in 2009.Compared with the West,China's treasury centralized payment system has developed slowly,and the analysis of centralized payment dynamic monitoring has lagged behind.Because the development of domestic financially centralized payment dynamic supervision mechanism is relatively late,during which the process of dynamic supervision application lags far behind the reform process of centralized treasury payment,there is no unified model,and in a large number of literature related to financial analysis,there is little References to treasury regulation related content.One of the important factors that led to the emergence of this problem is that the financial sector reforms implemented by government departments over the years have always been advocating the use of fiscal funds and corresponding accountability issues,while neglecting to strengthen the allocation of funds by government agencies.effectiveness.In order to improve the centralized treasury payment mechanism and improve the efficiency of fiscal fund resource allocation,this paper conducts a deeper discussion on the dynamic monitoring of centralized treasury payment through theoretical analysis combined with literature research,empirical analysis combined with normative analysis and other research methods.Under the current background of continuous deepening of the state treasury centralized payment reform,the development of the dynamic monitoring system and the development of the centralized treasury payment system are not balanced.As a result,the illegal use of fiscal funds is often found after the fact,and the irrational outflow of funds cannot be effectively and timely terminated.The cost is higher.Therefore,this paper summarizes the various problems that arise in the process of creating a dynamic monitoring mechanism,and in-depth study of the causes behind the problem,trying to reach a conclusion.In the specific part of the analysis of the centralized treasury centralized payment supervision,the specific objectives of dynamic supervision are first set up;secondly,the dynamic monitoring of the subject and object is introduced;the basic situation of monitoring the subject and object and the detailed description of the working process of treasury centralized payment are emphasized.Thirdly,the effect of dynamic monitoring has been discussed with emphasis on comprehensive use of comparisons,investigations,analysis,and consulting and other related methods,and the methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis have been fully integrated to arrive at more scientific and reliable conclusions.Then,summarize the problems existing in the dynamic monitoring mechanism and analyze the problems.This paper mainly analyzes and studies from three levels.The first is the personnel aspect,the second is the technical aspect,and the third is the institutional aspect.The in-depth analysis of these three aspects is mainly due to the lack of sense of responsibility of the Treasury Center,the immature monitoring support system,and the monitoring system to be improved.Fully integrate the specific conditions created by the dynamic monitoring mechanism of centralized treasury payment.This article has made an empirical study.Finally,from the three aspects of further strengthening the national library centralized payment dynamic monitoring management system,further deepening the construction of digital finance integration,and further improving the dynamic monitoring system of centralized treasury payment,we analyzed the necessity of improving the current treasury centralized payment dynamic monitoring system.Taking this as a starting point,the corresponding measures to optimize the dynamic monitoring mechanism were put forward to provide reference for financial institutions to revise the relevant rules and regulations.