A Comparative Study Of "History Of Chinese Historiography" By Jin Yufu And Naito Hunan

In the 1930s and 1940s,in the early period of the discipline of Chinese historiography,a number of Chinese historiographers appeared.Jin Yufu of "Chinese historical" with its rich historical materials,the rigorous accounts method become the representative works of historical studies during this period,marked the disciplinary of initial shape.And in the neighbouring Japan,Naito Konan as early as in the 20 s of the 20th century Chinese historical research,monograph "Chinese historical content is rich,venation clearly describes the development of Chinese historical process,can be said to be the earliest systematic study of Chinese historical works.Jin Yufu and Naito Konan "historical studies in China" are half of the 20th century Chinese historical works,reflect their understanding of Chinese history,but in the two books have different specific accounts.This article attempts through the study of the comparative study of two books,Jin Yufu and Naito Konan in the study of Chinese historical studies how different,thus to have further understanding of China's disciplinary start-up period.Jin Yufu has a traditional scholar's way of scholarly research,emphasizing textual research and heavy historical data.The history of Chinese historiography has been written and revised in two stages.Naito Konan was deeply influenced by his family and accepted good Sinology.Since then,the transformation from journalist to scholar status has made Naito Konan pay more attention to the times and reality in his academic research and formed a unique style.Two the selection of historians in Chinese history of history,the division of stages of history and the study of historiography in Qing Dynasty are the focus of this study.For historians,on the one hand,Kim Yu and Naito Konan both selected the frontier historical and historical studies of Qing Dynasty's historiography.On the other hand,he pays more attention to the important status of historical records,so it pays more attention to the historian who writes "the history of history",and Naito is more of the historians who start from historians themselves and pay more attention to the development of historiography.On the basis of historical staging,in general,Jin Yufu was based on historical records,historians and other factors,taking the rise of different dynasties as the standard,and Naito Konan was basically based on the "Song Dynasty theory of near world".In addition,the two people have made a major study of the history of the Qing Dynasty,all of which have made a detailed investigation of the textual scholars and the scholars of the border history and land.All of them highly esteem the history of Zhang Xue Cheng.Among them,Naito Konan's research on Qing Dynasty historiography is more comprehensive and traced back to the modern historiography created by the Song Dynasty.Through the analysis of the specific content of the history of Chinese historiography,we can see that Liang Qichao's works are deeply influenced by Liang Qichao and have strong textual characteristics.Naito Konan's work pays attention to the overall historiography and pays close attention to the historical background of historiography.Although there are different characteristics,but the two books are the representative works of the history of Chinese history,representing the overall research level of the history of that period.