A Study On The Acquisition Of Chinese Time Adverbs "Zai", "?" And "Zheng" By Korean Students

This article takes the time adverbs "zai","zheng" and "zhengzai" as research objects,and studies the acquisition based on Chinese native language corpus and Korean student interlanguage corpus.Firstly,based on the statistical analysis of the corpus of Chinese characters in the native Chinese language of 900,000 words,we will sort out the rules of "zai","zheng"and "zhengzai" ontology.In terms of collocations with verbs,the three are used as synonymous temporal adverbs,and the frequency of combinations of active verbs and terminal verbs is high,indicating the progression of actions or the continuation of states.There are some differences in the combination of state verbs and momentary verbs."Zai" has a time period meaning,so it is less combined with a state verb and an instantaneous verb.In contrast,"zheng" and "zhengzai" have time-point meanings and can indicate the time-matching with the action behavior.Therefore,the frequency of co-occurrence with state verbs and instantaneous verbs is relatively high.In addition,in the case of the substitution between the three,we have conducted a quantitative study and found that when the sentence represents the meaning of the implementation,the "zai","zheng",and "zhengzai" can be replaced with each other.When the time-point semantics are emphasized in the sentence,"zheng" and "zhengzai" can be replaced with each other.However,since "zheng" cannot modify the light-bar verb,when the light-pole verb appears in the sentence,if it is only a general expression of meaning,"zai" and "zheng" can be replaced with each other.If the time-point semantics are emphasized at this time,only use "zhengzai".Secondly,when repeated/continuing time adverbs such as "always","still","ratio"/arrangement/contrast,and "shi zai..." structure appear in the sentence,they can only be used "zai" and cannot be replaced by "zheng" or "zhengzai".When the"zhengzai" modified verb is used as an attributive,it cannot be replaced by "zai";when "zhengzai" is modified by a bare-pole verb,it cannot be replaced by "zheng".In addition,when "premature" prepositional phrases,"verbs + de + adjectives",and partial instantaneous verbs or linked phrases are present in a sentence,in that case,it can use "zheng",not"zai" or "zhengzai".In addition,through the Korean student's 900,000-word interlanguage material(300,000 characters each in the elementary,intermediate,advanced level),we examined the Korean students' acquisition of the three.First,in terms of correct use cases,learners use the most common activity verbs,followed by state verbs.The use of end verbs and instant verbs is rarely used.In the use of the three alternatives,the learners mostly focused on the replacement of the three,and used less of the three irreplaceable situations,indicating that they did not have a good grasp of"zai","zheng" and "zhengzai".Second,in terms of misuse cases,the biases of South Korean students concentrate on the redundancy caused by the semantic conflict between righteousness and fulfilled meanings,the mis-generation between the three,the mis-generation of verbs,the collocation of related verbs mssing and other aspects.Finally,comparing the output of the three Chinese native speakers with the output of the three interlanguage corpus in Korean,we found that the frequency of using native speakers is:zai>zheng>zhengzai.The frequency of Korean students is:zai>zhengzai>zheng.And then analyze the similarities and differences in the tendencies of Chinese native speakers and Chinese learners.In addition,the syllabus and related tutorials examine the setup and arrangement of "zai","zheng" and "zhengzai" and make teaching suggestions based on the law of acquisition.