A Study Of Stirring The Social Investment By Marketization Of Non-basic Public Service System

As China's economic development enters a new normal,economic growth has shifted from high-speed to medium-high speed.At the same time,the demand for medium-to-high-end consumption,especially the demand for medium-to-high-end services,has been increasing along with economic growth.The market-oriented reform of non-basic public services is expected to stimulate social investment.An important means of vitality.Since the 19 th National Congress of the Communist Party of China,emerging businesses in the social field have emerged.In September 2017,the General Office of the State Council issued the "Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Further Mobilizing the Investment in the Social Sector",focusing on education,health and social work.Social investment such as culture,sports and entertainment provides guidance and regulation.Specific measures such as relaxing industry access and expanding investment and financing channels were proposed.China's economic development has entered a new era.With the continuous improvement of the level of productivity,the people's demand for providing higher-level public services in the social field has also been continuously enhanced.It is crucial to make full use of the effective means of market-oriented reform of non-basic public services in order to solve the problem of insufficient social investment vitality.This paper follows the research idea of "propose a problem-analyze the problem-solve the problem",and focus on the current situation of insufficient investment vitality in China's social field,focusing on the research of public service field,and proposing the market-oriented reform of non-basic public service to stimulate the vitality of social investment.Internal mechanism and implementation path.Starting from the problems of basic public services,this paper analyzes the problems of non-equalization and insufficient supply within the system.On this basis,it puts forward the specific ideas of stimulating the vitality of social investment through non-basic public services and market-oriented reforms.On the basis of the relevant theoretical basis and literature review of the market-basedreform of non-basic public services,further on the non-equalization of basic public services and the lack of effective supply,the relationship between non-basic public service market reform and investment dynamism,and the non-basic public service market.In-depth analysis of the internal mechanism of the reform and stimulating the vitality of social investment,and comprehensively taking into account the historical context of the non-basic public service marketization reform to stimulate the vitality of social investment,analyzing the policy effect of non-basic public service marketization reform to stimulate investment vitality,using empirical evidence The research methodology explains the effects of non-basic public services in the three areas of education,health and social work,culture,sports and entertainment.The research in this paper shows that the market-oriented reform of non-basic public services faces difficulties in the process of stimulating investment vitality.It is manifested in the following aspects: first,high market access threshold and high regulation;second,investment and financing policies are not supported,and effective supply of public goods is insufficient.Third,there is a lack of competition mechanism and innovation organization in the integration of innovation;Fourth,in terms of supervision,non-basic public service areas are single,the rule of law is not sound,and the supervision methods are outdated.Based on the successful experience of the market-oriented reform of relevant international non-basic public services and the development of China,the countermeasures and suggestions for stimulating the vitality of social investment are put forward: first,to stimulate the vitality of the market and better play the role of the government;The reform of the “distribution service” will truly achieve the right to decentralize the government;the third is to innovate the organizational structure and actively cultivate the pluralistic subjects;the fourth is to open up the market and strengthen fair supervision and fair competition.