Effectiveness of a mining simulation cooperative learning activity on the cognitive and affective achievement of students in a lower division physical geology course: A confluent approach

Most students enrolled in lower division physical geology courses are non-majors and tend to finish the course with little appreciation of what it is geologists really do. They may also be expected to analyze, synthesize, and apply knowledge from previous laboratory experiences with little or no instruction and/or practice in utilizing the critical thinking skills necessary to do so.; This study sought to answer two research questions: (1) do physical geology students enrolled in a course designed around a mining simulation activity perform better cognitively than students who are taught the same curriculum in the traditional fashion; and (2) do students enrolled in the course gain a greater appreciation of physical geology and the work that geologists do.; Eighty students enrolled in the course at Columbia College, Sonora, California over a two year period. During the first year, thirty-one students were taught the traditional physical geology curriculum. During the second year, forty-nine students were taught the traditional curriculum up until week nine, then they were taught a cooperative learning mining simulation activity for three weeks.; A static group, split plot, repeated measures design was used. Pre- and post-tests were administered to students in both the control and treatment groups. The cognitive assessment instrument was validated by content area experts in the University of South Carolina Geological Sciences Department. Students were given raw lithologic, gravimetric, topographic, and environmental data with which to construct maps and perform an overlay analysis. They were tested on the cognitive reasoning and spatial analysis they used to make decisions about where to test drill for valuable metallic ores. The affective instrument used a six point Likert scale to assess students' perceived enjoyment, interest, and importance of the material.; Gains scores analysis of cognitive achievement data showed a mean of 2.43 for the control group and 4.47 for the treatment group, statistically significantly different at the alpha = 0.05 level (p = 0.0038). Gains scores for the affective data indicated no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups. The simulation seems to make a difference in terms of students' intellectual performance, but not in terms of their attitudinal perceptions of the course.; Results support the hypothesis that cognitive achievement is improved by a cooperative learning mining simulation activity. One implication might include adapting and implementing the model in lower division physical geology courses. Another would be to develop similar activities for other lower division, non-majors earth science courses (i.e. environmental geology, astronomy, meteorology, oceanography, etc.) that could improve students' subject matter knowledge. Additionally, the research supports shifting the locus of control from the instructor to students as well as the use of the principles of active learning, cooperative learning, and confluent education in the science classroom.