Research On Cost-sharing Contract Of A New Energy Vehicle Green Supply Chain

In recent years,some European countries have formulated plans to replace traditional energy vehicles with new energy vehicles.China’s new energy vehicle companies are also surging.Auto companies such as BYD and Xiaopeng Motors are constantly developing new energy vehicles.But for battery manufacturers,in order to improve the level of green energy-saving,it is necessary to bear the cost required to develop and apply the level of green energy-saving.Higher costs will discourage battery manufacturers’ research and development enthusiasm.Therefore,this paper proposes a cost sharing mechanism.This article first constructed three models of cost-sharing and non-sharing new energy supply chains.Through comparative analysis,we find the effect of cost-sharing contracts on the wholesale prices,energy-saving level,retail prices,and the profits of battery manufacturers and electric vehicle manufacturers.The fourth chapter is based on the third chapter,from the perspective of external factors,respectively,the impact of the cost-sharing contract on the supply chain when the government provides cost subsidies and price subsidies.The fifth chapter considers the impact of cost-sharing contracts on the supply chain when battery manufacturers and physical stores assume social responsibility from the perspective of internal factors.The sixth chapter considers the impact of cost-sharing contracts on the supply chain when battery manufacturers and physical stores are concerned about fairness from the perspective of another internal cause.The main conclusions are as follows:(1)In the case of cost apportionment,the energy saving level,wholesale price and retail price will decrease with the increase of the company’s cost apportionment ratio,and the energy saving level will gradually approach the energy saving level in the case of no cost apportionment as the cost apportionment ratio increases..In the case of cost apportionment,the profit of the battery manufacturer decreases with the increase of the company’s cost apportionment ratio and gradually tends to the profit when the cost is not apportioned.In the case of cost apportionment,the electric vehicle manufacturer’s profit rises with the increase of the enterprise’s cost apportionment ratio and gradually tends to the profit when the cost is not apportioned.(2)In the case of cost apportionment,when the government grants price subsidies,the battery manufacturer’s profit decreases with the increase in the enterprise’s cost apportionment ratio and gradually tends to the profit when the cost is not apportioned;when the government gives cost subsidies,the battery manufacturer’s profit Profits increase with the increase in the company’s cost apportionment ratio and gradually tend to be the profit when the cost is not apportioned.When the government grants price subsidies or cost subsidies,the energy-saving level,wholesale price,and retail price in the case of cost-sharing will decrease as the company’s cost-sharing ratio increases.In the case of cost apportionment,when the government provides price subsidies or cost subsidies,the electric vehicle manufacturer’s profit increases with the increase of the enterprise’s cost apportionment ratio and gradually tends to the profit when the cost is not apportioned.(3)In the case of cost apportionment,when the battery manufacturer assumes social responsibility,the battery manufacturer’s profit decreases as the company’s cost apportionment ratio increases and gradually tends to the profit when the cost is not apportioned;when the electric vehicle manufacturer undertakes social responsibility,The profit of the battery manufacturer decreases with the increase of the enterprise’s cost apportionment ratio,and the battery manufacturer’s profit when the cost is apportioned is greater than the profit when the cost is not apportioned.When a battery manufacturer or electric vehicle manufacturer assumes social responsibility,in the case of cost sharing,the energy-saving level,wholesale price and retail price decrease as the company’s cost-sharing ratio increases,and the energy-saving level gradually approach the energy-saving level in the case of no cost sharing.In the case of cost apportionment,the electric vehicle manufacturer’s profit rises as the company’s cost sharing ratio increases.(4)When the battery manufacturer or electric vehicle manufacturer’s decision-making objective is to maximize utility,in the case of cost sharing,the energy-saving level,wholesale price,retail price,battery manufacturer’s profit/utility,and electric vehicle manufacturer’s profit/benefit will increase with the company’s cost-sharing ratio The energy-saving level and electric vehicle manufacturer’s profit/benefit are gradually approaching the energy-saving level and electric vehicle manufacturer’s profit/benefit under the condition of no cost sharing.In general,the energy-saving level,wholesale price,retail price,and electric vehicle manufacturer’s profit/benefit under all the cost-sharing scenarios in Chapter 4 will decrease with the increase in the company’s cost-sharing ratio,and the energy-saving level will gradually approach that under the non-Cost Sharing situation.In the case of cost apportionment in the basic model of Chapter 3,the battery manufacturer’s profit decreases with the increase of the enterprise’s cost apportionment ratio and gradually tends to the profit when the cost is not apportioned;the electric vehicle manufacturer’s profit is the opposite.When the government grants price subsidies,the battery manufacturer’s profit decreases with the increase in the enterprise’s cost-sharing ratio and gradually tends to the profit when the cost is not apportioned;when the government gives cost subsidies,the battery manufacturer’s profit changes trend in the opposite direction.When the government provides cost subsidies,it is more beneficial for battery manufacturers to increase profits than when the government does not provide cost sharing.When the battery manufacturer assumes social responsibility,the profit of the battery manufacturer decreases with the increase in the cost-sharing ratio of the enterprise and gradually tends to the profit when the cost is not amortized;when the electric vehicle manufacturer assumes the social responsibility,the trend of the battery manufacturer’s profit changes is the opposite.Whether battery manufacturers or automobile manufacturers undertake social responsibility is conducive to the improvement of corporate profits and energy saving level.When the decision goal of battery manufacturer or automobile manufacturer is utility maximization,the profit/benefit of automobile manufacturer gradually approaches the profit/benefit of automobile manufacturer in the case of cost-sharing and automobile manufacturer.The management implications are as follows: both battery manufacturers and car manufacturers should strive to assume social responsibility,which is conducive to improving their profits.When battery manufacturers or electric vehicle manufacturers have equity concerns,cost sharing is more advantageous than cost sharing,and battery manufacturers and electric vehicle manufacturers should actively promote cost sharing.In other cases,battery manufacturers are always willing to share costs,and when they do,electric vehicle manufacturers push for a higher share.Governments will always choose cost subsidies over price subsidies,and battery manufacturers and electric vehicle manufacturers will always benefit more.Fairness concerns of battery manufacturers are more beneficial than fairness concerns of car manufacturers.