| China began to pilot the criminal speedy trial procedure in some areas in 2014,and the rapid adjudication procedure was formally stipulated in the amendment of the criminal procedure law in 2018.The criminal speedy trial procedure is to alleviate the contradiction between the current shortage of judicial resources and the large number of cases in China.Quick adjudication procedure is a more summary procedure than summary procedure,and it is the pursuit of efficiency as the basic value.At the same time,with the deepening of the reform of the trial-centered litigation system,it also puts forward higher requirements for the criminal quick adjudication procedure.It is worth noting that if the focus of the expedited proceedings is only on the pursuit of the improvement of the efficiency of the proceedings,it will ignore the protection of the rights of the accused,and therefore.Firstly,this paper makes a brief exposition on the background and the concept of the system of the criminal speedy trial procedure,and analyzes the necessity and feasibility of the protection of the rights of the litigants in this procedure in combination with the theoretical basis of the application of the criminal speedy trial procedure.Secondly,it summarizes the content of the legal protection of the rights of the litigants the litigants,and analyzes the specific provisions of the current legislation on the protection of the rights of the litigants:the right to appeal,the right to choose of the litigants,and the right of the litigants,including the right to know.In order to provide relevant reference for the improvement of the protection of the rights of the litigants in China’s speedy trial procedure,the author tries to find out the spiritual core of the litigants’ rights in the similar systems in the United States and civil law.Finally,the measures to improve the protection of the rights of the litigants in the speedy adjudication procedure include:fully protecting the right of the litigants to know,constructing the voluntary examination mechanism of guilty plea and punishment,and improving the effectiveness of the legal help of the duty lawyers,building a unified sentencing standard. |