Analysis On The Effect Of The Government Guiding The Young People To Return Home To Start Their Own Business

There are numerous media reports on youth returning home and starting businesses,and the government has issued a number of policy documents to encourage and mobilize young people to return home and start businesses.So,does the specific effect of the government’s guidance of young people return to their hometowns and start-ups conform to the original intentions of relevant personnel and organizations,and do they deviate from the general trend of urbanization.In order to verify these issues,the research used the literature method,the comparative method and the semi-structured interview method to conduct argumentation from three perspectives: first,the comparison between history and reality.Comparing the historical events of youths flowing from cities to rural areas in 1949,compared with the current phenomenon of government-led youth returning home and starting businesses,it is found that the government-led youth flows from cities to rural areas are caused by the sluggish domestic economic development and difficulties in employment in cities.The problem occurred in the context of active government mobilization.From the perspective of the final implementation effect of each event,it is not ideal,and the specific manifestation is the return of youth from the countryside to the city.Second,the comparison between domestic and foreign countries.In this part,it is confirmed that the development of urbanization is the inevitable trend of the development of all countries in the world.Taking this conclusion as a premise,comparing the phenomenon of the flow of Chinese youth from cities to rural areas and the inverse urban phenomenon abroad,it is found that there is an essential difference between the phenomenon of the flow of young people from cities to rural areas in China and the western phenomenon of reverse urbanization.This difference is caused by the external environment and endogenous restrictions of China’s urbanization development.Third,the combination of theory and practice.Drawing on stakeholder theory,taking G County in Henan Province as a demonstration county for migrant workers returning to their hometowns as an example,an empirical study on the specific effects of government-led youth return to entrepreneurship found that the specific effects of the government-led youth return to entrepreneurship and related personnel Not consistent with the original intention of the organization.The performance is that the local government does not pay enough attention to the implementation of youth return home business;the local youth who choose to go out are still mainstream;the guiding policy has little effect on the youth’s choice of returning home business;the youth returning home business has a guiding policy.The level of awareness and satisfaction is low.It was finally concluded that the specific effects of the government’s guidance of young people to return to their hometowns for entrepreneurship did not fully comply with the original intentions of the relevant personnel and organizations,and did not fit the basic trend of urbanization.This puts forward relevant suggestions: The government should respect the law of urbanization development,reduce inappropriate propaganda,encourage young people to move freely,and break down the institutional barriers to mobility.