The Connotation Evolution And Procedural Response Of Criminal Trial Openness

Open trial is an important part of judicial reform.Promoting open criminal trials can ensure citizens ’right to know and supervise to the greatest extent,and turn judicial justice into visible and tangible justice.In a society where Internet information is rapidly developing,there are still some problems in the opening of criminal trials,how to deal with the relationship between the media and the judiciary,how the courts respond to social queries under the impact of the wave of public opinion,how to improve the open trial online platform,and promote the substantive reasoning of the judgment documents We all need to look at it rationally.At the same time,on the basis of adhering to the principle of open trial,the court should also face up to the problems existing in the openness of criminal trials,eliminate their own misunderstandings,change their thinking,adopt a reasonable and flexible procedural response mechanism,realize "promoting justice through openness",and enhance public Confidence in justice truly establishes the authority of justice.This article is mainly divided into three parts.The first part is the connotation development and positioning of open criminal trial.By elaborating the principles and connotation of the openness of criminal trials,the content methods of the current openness of criminal trials are drawn.Combined with the development of the perspective of the historical development of the open trial,combined with the continuous release of relevant documents,to analyze the value of the current criminal trial open positioning.The second part is the analysis of the status quo of open criminal trials.Combined with China’s judicial practice,in the context of the Internet in today’s big data era,collect cases with high public interest,analyze from the aspects of live broadcast of court hearings,public verdicts,and judicial credibility.While affirming its achievements,it also looks at issues rationally,such as: The document lacks reasoning,lacks substantive disclosure,and public opinion abducts the trial,etc.,and analyzes the cause of the problem.The third part is based on the problem elaboration in the second part,and proposes a corresponding program response mechanism.For example,the court should fully implement the opening of criminal trials,strictly abide by the bottom line of the principle of open trial,and make some flexible changes.In today’s era of informatization and judicial modernization,we must also pay attention to standardizing open trial online platforms such as the live court hearing network and the judgment document network.At the same time,we must establish a reasonable and perfect public opinion response mechanism to enable the court to respond to public feedback in a reasonable manner,while focusing on multi-channel standardized Public opinion collection.At the same time,I also put forward some thoughts on China’s criminal trial.If the court needs to focus onimproving itself,it can be refined to the quality training of the judge who is the main body of the trial.At the same time,it must also change the concept and make an essential distinction between the opening of the trial and the judicial publicity.Balance the interests of all parties;let the "big cases" that are of high concern become a model for open trials,and promote the development of the rule of law with case interpretation.The purpose of this article is to start with current judicial practice,analyze theories and related documents and hot cases,find problems from the perspective of criminal litigation,analyze and discuss the current situation of criminal trial openness in China,propose a response mechanism,and further improve the thinking With a view to making meager views on the development of open criminal trials.