The Influence Of Basketball Dbbling Training On Self-control Of Mobile Phone Addicts

Mobile phone addiction is a behavioral addiction that involves excessive use of Mobile phones and has negative effects on cognition,interpersonal relationships and schoolwork.Self control is the tendency of people to overcome their innate desires,habits,or behavioral responses,and the ability to consistently maintain adaptive behaviors.Self-control can be divided into cognitive self-control and behavioral self-control.Among them,cognitive self-control refers to an individual’s ability to concentrate on thinking in order to complete goal-related tasks,while behavioral self-control refers to an individual’s ability to overcome potential impulses and continue to complete behavioral tasks.Teenagers are prone to mobile phone dependence,and it is also a critical period for the development of individual self-control.Previous studies have shown that mobile phone addiction is associated with individual self-control deficits,but the relationship between mobile phone addiction and self-control in adolescents needs to be further explored.In the context of "Healthy China",the concept of the benefits of exercise intervention has been deepening into various health fields.It remains to be seen whether basketball,as a popular sport,can be used as a potential way to improve adolescents’ self-control ability and thus become an effective way to prevent and control their mobile phone dependence.In this study,the Stroop task and the Handshake task were used to comprehensively examine the cognitive self-control and behavioral self-control of mobile phone addicts.On this basis,a basketball dribbling training intervention program lasting for 9 weeks was designed to explore the effect of sports intervention on the self-control ability of mobile phone addicts,so as to alleviate the degree of mobile phone dependence.The study is divided into two parts.In the first study,34 subjects(17 mobile phone addicts and 17 non-mobile phone addicts)were selected from 4 classes of Grade One at random through the Adolescent Mobile Phone Dependence Scale.Mobile phone use questionnaire,Stroop task and Handshake task were used to compare the differences in mobile phone use characteristics,cognitive self-control and behavioral self-control between mobile phone addicts and non-addicts.The results are as follows:1.Results: In terms of mobile phone use status(sitting or moving),more than80% of the students in the mobile phone addiction group or the non-addiction group played mobile phones in a sitting position;In terms of the purpose of mobile phone use(study,entertainment,other),the time spent on study in the non-mobile phone addiction group was significantly higher than that in the mobile phone addiction group(t=3.72,p <0.001).As for the duration of mobile phone use,the time of mobile phone use in the group with mobile phone addiction was significantly higher than that in the group without mobile phone addiction,whether on school days or holidays(t school days =3.23,p<0.001;tholiday =4.51,p <0.001);In the self-control score,the score of the non-mobile phone addiction group was significantly higher than that of the mobile phone addiction group(t=7.38,p <0.001).2.The results of Stroop task showed :(1)Reaction time index.Under the condition of Stroop task inconsistency,the completion time of non-mobile phone addiction group was shorter than that of addiction group(t=-2.13,p<0.05).Under the same condition,there was no significant difference between the two groups(t=-1.67,p>0.05).The interference effect(inconsistent condition minus consistent condition)was significantly different between the two groups(t=-2.79,p <0.05).(2)in the accuracy index.The accuracy rates of consistent condition and inconsistent condition in the non-addiction group were higher than those in the addiction group(t consistent condition =2.70,p<0.05;T inconsistency condition =2.13,p<0.05).The interference effect(inconsistent condition minus consistent condition)was significantly different between the two groups(t=2.22,p <0.05).3.The handshaking task results showed that the handshaking duration of the non-mobile phone addicts was longer than that of the mobile phone addicts(t=-2.15,p<0.05).Conclusions from study one:compared with the non-mobile phone addiction group,the mobile phone addiction group had lower cognitive self-control and behavioral self-control indexes than the non-mobile phone addiction group,indicating that mobile phone addiction was closely related to self-control function.In the second study,3 classes of students in the first grade of junior high school were selected and 16 mobile phone addicts were selected as the non-intervention group(normal physical education activities)through the Adolescent Mobile Phone Dependence Scale.In addition,17 mobile phone addicts selected in the first study were selected as the intervention group,and a total of 33 subjects were introduced to basketball dribble training for 9 weeks.To explore the influence of basketball dribbling training on improving the self-control ability of mobile phone addicts,and then alleviate the effect of mobile phone addiction.The results are as follows:Results: The time spent on learning by mobile phones in the intervention group increased from 32% to 51% after the experiment compared with before the intervention,with a significant difference(t=-2.20,p<0.05).In terms of the degree of mobile phone dependence,the scores of mobile phone dependence in the intervention group decreased from 41 points to 33 points after exercise intervention,and the degree of mobile phone dependence was significantly decreased after the experiment(t=2.13,p<0.05).In terms of self-control,the intervention group increased from 53 points before the experiment to 65 points after the experiment.The results of intra-group comparison showed that there was a significant difference in self-control measured before and after the experiment(t=-3.12,p<0.05).The comparison between groups after the experiment showed that the self-control ability of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the non-intervention group(t=-2.52,p <0.05).Finally,there was no significant difference in physical activity between the two groups(p>0.05),indicating that the amount of physical activity was balanced between the two groups during the experiment.2.The results of Stroop task showed that:(1)Interfering effect of accuracy: the interaction between measurement order and exercise intervention was not significant,indicating that basketball dribbling training failed to improve students’ inhibition and control ability,which may be related to the insensitivity of the set accuracy index.(2)Interference effect: the interaction between group and measurement order was significant,F(1,31)=11.35,η 2=0.16,p<0.05.Further simple effect test results showed that there was a significant difference between the intervention group and the non-intervention group(p<0.05),while there was no significant difference between the non-intervention group and the non-intervention group(p >0.05).The reduction of the interference effect between the intervention group and the intervention group indicated that the basketball dribbling training intervention could improve the self-control ability of mobile phone addicts in the first grade of junior high school.3.The results of handshaking task showed that the time effect was significant in the group F(1,31)=20.90,p<0.05;Group effect was significant between groups,F(1,31)=0.87,p<0.05;The interaction effect of time and group was significant,F(1,31)=10.26,p<0.05.Further simple effect test results showed that there was a significant difference between the intervention group and the non-intervention group(p<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the non-intervention group and the non-intervention group(p>0.05),indicating that basketball dribbling training can improve the self-control ability of mobile phone addicts.Conclusions from study two:the overall 9-week basketball dribbling training could effectively improve the cognitive self-control and behavioral self-control of mobile phone addicts in the first grade.