| Rhythmic gymnastics is a difficult and beautiful event combining competitive sports and dance.It is divided into two categories: individual events and collective events.Compared with some other developed countries,Rhythmic Gymnastics in China started relatively late,and the popularity of Rhythmic Gymnastics in China is low,which leads to an obvious gap between China and the powerful Russian team in international competitions.In rhythmic gymnastics,the most prominent collective event is the difficulty of cooperation,which is the most significant feature different from other events.In the rules of the new Olympic Games period,the quality requirements for the difficulty of cooperation have been raised.There are clear scores for the number of athletes participating in the difficulty of cooperation.The structural difficulty of cooperation has increased.It is required to pay more attention to the multiplicity of space when arranging actions,and make full use of the change of formation,the flow of orientation and the height of athletes and equipment to reflect the multi-layer and diversity of space,and highlight the spatial artistry of rhythmic gymnastics.Therefore,we should take advantage of the new opportunities and new directions brought by the new rules in 2022 to China’s rhythmic gymnastics,compare and analyze the differences and deficiencies between China’s rhythmic gymnastics team and the Russian team in terms of the difficulty of cooperation in collective events in combination with the new rules,and make full use of the controllable factor of arrangement to break through and realize the desire to narrow the gap between China’s rhythmic gymnastics level and the world’s powerful teams.Based on the 2017-2020 and 2022-2024 scoring rules,this paper studies and compares the 2019.2020 World Championship rhythmic gymnastics group events,and makes a comparative analysis on the type arrangement and presentation of the cooperation difficulty,the formation arrangement in space,the orientation arrangement,the body movements of sports mobilization and the presentation of the movement arrangement of equipment movements of the Chinese and Russian collective events.Draw the following conclusions:1.the Chinese team focuses on the simple Cr and CRR cooperation types in the arrangement of cooperative actions,while the Russian team mostly chooses the CR2 and crr2 cooperation types with high difficulty and high score in the arrangement.2.the Chinese team did not adopt the uniform formation as the Russian team in the arrangement of difficult cooperative formation.The formation of our country is mainly concentrated in irregular formation and group formation 3/2.3.divide the rhythmic gymnastics venue into 9 areas as a nine palace grid to analyze the presentation orientation of the cooperation difficulty.There is not much difference in the presentation of cooperative movements between China and Russia,which has closely followed the pace of world power teams.Most of them focus on the presentation of cooperative movements in position 5,followed by positions 6,8 and 4.4.divide the rhythmic gymnastics space into five spaces.The spatial level presentation and arrangement of the difficult body movements of the Chinese and Russian rhythmic gymnastics collective events are mainly concentrated in the second floor space.Presentation of equipment action space most of China’s cooperative difficult equipment actions are selected in the three-layer composite space,while the Russian team will also take into account the matching presentation of the two-layer space when selecting the complex three-layer space,so as to diversify the form of complete presentation. |