| Under the background of the deepening of urban-rural integration,the continuous expansion of cities and the continuous increase of population lead to the practical problems such as the destruction of cultural landscape,the neglect of historical and cultural resources,and the lack of integration and utilization of cultural landscape.These problems makes the suburban cultural landscape elements fuzzy and their functions chaotic,which not only seriously hinders the development of the cultural landscape in the suburban areas,but also reduces the cultural confidence and cultural identity of the urban and rural residents.Therefore,this study selected Choujiang Street,a typical representative of the suburban area,Yiwu City,as the research object,aiming to understand the elements and structure of the cultural landscape in the suburban area,to explore the problems and deficiencies in the development,and expected to provide reference for the renewal and optimization of the cultural landscape in the suburban area.First of all,this paper reviews the elements of cultural landscape,cultural identity research methods and other related theory,determine the cultural landscape classification structure composed of three main elements and seven characteristic elements,and on this basis using the field survey method,questionnaire survey to make a survey,which includes resources and construction status of material elements、immaterial elements and contact elements of cultural landscape and residents’ perception and satisfaction with them.The results show that among the three blocks surveyed,the suburban villages have the best preservation of cultural landscape resources,the most complete types and the highest satisfaction scores,and all kinds of cultural elements exceeded 3 points.The natural elements in material elements and time elements and technical elements in contact element of the suburban community are relatively lacking,and residents are also not satisfied with them,with the correlation coefficient of 2.57,2.98 and 2.87.The three types of cultural landscape elements in the urban-rural junction community all have the problems of lacking and low satisfaction of residents,the natural elements in the material elements,satisfaction is 1.89;the spiritual elements in the immaterial elements,satisfaction is 2.66;and the time elements in the contact elements,satisfaction is 2.53.The correlation analysis of the influencing factors of cultural landscape satisfaction shows that:(1)the satisfaction of residents with cultural landscape is related to their gender and identity,and the older residents are more satisfied with the time elements and rule elements;the local residents are more satisfied with the time elements and skill elements than others.(2)There is a strong correlation between the satisfaction of cultural landscape components.With Pearson coefficient as the standard,the lowest correlation coefficient is the rule elements and natural elements,at 0.355,and the highest is the time elements and behavioral elements,at 0.743.(3)Residents’ satisfaction with cultural elements is significantly correlated with their existence.The lowest correlation coefficient is 0.575 for the behavioral elements,and the highest is 0.672 for the time elements.Secondly,based on the current situation investigation,we dig deep into the problems faced by each block of Choujiang Street and the reasons for insufficient satisfaction,and find that the root cause lies in the patterned development of urban expansion,ignoring the softening of the spiritual level and the organic injection of culture,makes the regional characteristic culture loss,residents and cultural alienation,cultural landscape elements of presence and participation in differentiation decline,lead to different residents satisfaction level.Finally,based on the above analysis,this paper proposes four optimization and improvement strategies.They are strengthening the excavation of street characteristic culture,guiding the integration of multicultural elements,promoting the creation of cultural inheritance space and the collaborative participation of multiple subjects. |