A Study On The Application Of The Integration Of Teacher Feedback And Peer Feedback In English Writing Teaching In Senior High School

Writing is an important productive skill in the five essential skills of English.In the teaching of high school English writing,although more and more scholars advocate the teaching method of combining peer feedback and teacher feedback,there are still many situations in practical application based on teacher feedback,which makes students in a passive state of acceptance,which is not conducive to developing learning autonomy,while peer feedback is conducive to develop students’ learning autonomy through cooperative learning.And due to the pressure of coursework,it is difficult for teachers to provide targeted opinions on each student’s essay,while peer feedback is based on small groups and provides feedback to each other within the group,which can make up for its shortcomings.However,due to their limited English proficiency,students sometimes find it difficult to provide effective and reasonable feedback,and need guidance from teachers.Therefore,in the practical application of teaching,combining the two teaching methods can make up for each other’s shortcomings and give play to better advantages.In order to explore more effective feedback methods to improve learners’ writing skills,this study mainly explores the following three questions:1.What are the main problems of high school students in English writing?2.How to apply the combination of teacher feedback and peer feedback to solve the problems existing in the current writing of high school students?3.Can the combination of teacher feedback and peer feedback improve the English writing level of high school students?In order to answer the above three questions,this study is based on Scaffold Theory and Process Writing Method,and try to apply the combination of teacher feedback and peer feedback in high school English writing teaching,using a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods,mainly including questionnaire survey method,test method,text analysis method and interview method.First,through the questionnaire survey and pre-test paper analysis to find the main problems in the current writing.According to the results,specific teaching procedures combining teacher feedback and peer feedback were designed.Then,essay score analysis to explore whether students’ English writing level has improved,and finally through data collation and analysis,this study has the following main findings:1.The problems existing in the high school students are mainly divided into five aspects,namely writing norms,vocabulary,grammar,chapter structure and ideological content,which are 3.2500,2.9545,3.0227,3.1818 and 2.5000,indicating that the high school students have problems in these five aspects.2.In view of the above five problems,by forming a more effective teaching mode,students can solve the problems in English writing,among which peer feedback mainly plays a role in writing norms,grammar and vocabulary,and the average scores of individual items are increased by 0.97727,1.13636 and 1.06818 points.Teacher feedback has the greatest influence on the structure and ideological content of the chapter,and the average score of a single item increased by 0.27273 and 0.45455 points,and in the application process of combining teacher feedback and peer feedback,teachers’ guidance for peer feedback is also very important,which is conducive to the smooth progress of peer feedback.3.The combination of teacher feedback and peer feedback has a positive impact on writing,the post-test score increased by 1.3555 points compared with the pre-test score,of which the low-level group and the middle-level group improved the most,the scores increased by 1.91644 and 0.97802 points,followed by the high-level group,the score increased by 0.73786 points,and after the application,combined with the interview results,it was found that the students’ writing level was improved.Finally,due to the short application time of this teaching,the limited sample of the subjects,the author’s lack of experience and other factors,there are certain shortcomings in this study.More in-depth and detailed research is needed in the future.