On Stirner's Influence On Marx's Though

This paper examines the relationship between the young Hegelian Stirner and Marx and discusses the role of Stirner’s critique of Feuerbach in "stimulating" and promoting the development of Marx’s thought and the role of Marx’s critique of Stirner in the development of Marx’s thought.The first part,based on correspondence and biographical material,describes Stirner’s personal contacts and intellectual connections with Marx and Engels as a young Hegelian.While Stirner’s The One and All His Own develops a fierce critique of Feuerbach,Engels is positive about the book,affirming the available value of Stirner’s ideas,but Marx shows his opposition to the book from the very beginning.Although Marx’s reply letter to Engels was lost,Marx’s negative and critical attitude toward Stirner can be inferred from Engels’ subsequent change of attitude toward Stirner.The full excavation of the personal interactions and intellectual encounters between Marx,Engels and Stirner is of great significance for understanding the transformation of Marx’s thinking in his youth.In the second part,the contribution of Stirner’s ideas to the transformation of Marx’s thought is argued.In the period 1844-1845,Marx’s thought underwent a profound and dramatic transformation within a short period of time,and Stirner’s The One and All His Own is a major contribution to the transformation of Marx’s thought,which is reflected in both positive and negative impulses:the "positive impulse" refers to Stirner’s abstraction of Feuerbach’s The "positive impetus" refers to Steiner’s critique of Feuerbach’s abstraction of "classes",which is in line with the trend of Marx’s thought.With the help of Steiner’s critique,Marx recognized more clearly the dilemma of Feuerbach’s humanistic logic and subverted it with a realistic and historical logic;the "negative impetus" refers to the fact that Steiner stimulated Marx to reflect deeply on the fundamental differences between his own thought and Feuerbach’s,and to express them clearly.It is this positive and negative impetus that fully demonstrates the positive significance of Stirner in the development of Marx’s thought.In the third part,Marx’s exhaustive critique of Stirner is argued.In the "St.Max" chapter of The German Ideology,Marx launched an extremely detailed and sharp critique of Stirner and his work The Only One and All His Own,and it is in this textual commentary that Marx deepened his understanding of the nature of man and his subjectivity,and that he took the "subjectivity" of man in a certain mode of production and social relations as the basis for his "subjectivity".The "real individual" in a certain mode of production and social relations transcends Stirner’s abstract "One" and complements and tests his own "Feuerbach" chapter of the German Ideology.The fourth part summarizes Marx’s analysis of the "real individual" beyond Steiner’s abstract "One".In the fourth part,the role of Marx’s critique of Stirner in the development of Marx’s thought is summarized.The thesis systematically summarizes the role of Marx’s critique of Stirner in the development.Overall,Stirner plays an important role in the transformation and development of thought during Marx’s youth,a role that is both consistent in the common critique of Feuerbach’s thought and transcendent in the initial construction of historical materialism with the help of the critique of Stirner.Therefore,an in-depth and complete understanding and grasp of the transformation and development of Marx’s thought during his youth is inseparable from an in-depth study of Stirner’s thought.