| For a long time,the United States has often invoked its domestic legislation to impose unilateral sanctions on foreign countries,with increasingly diversified means and expanding the scope of sanctions.In recent years,the United States even imposed sanctions on Chinese enterprises under the pretext of Xinjiang cotton issue.In 2021,the US enacted the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act,which prohibits products produced under so-called "forced labor" in Xinjiang from entering the US,citing allegations of "forced labor" in China’s Xinjiang region.This incident fully highlights the United States slander Xinjiang cotton enterprises with the rumors of "forced labor and human rights violation",so as to achieve sanctions against Chinese enterprises and reconstruct the global cotton supply chain,and also reflects the importance of China’s active improvement of legislation and protection of human rights in supply chains.This is a violation of the principles of international law and a blow to ordinary businesses and the regional economy.With the changing international situation and the need to respond to foreign sanctions,our country is actively building an anti-sanctions legal system and has promulgated laws and regulations such as Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law,Export Control Law and Regulations on List of Unreliable Entities.These laws can help our country respond to unilateral sanctions of other countries and improve its own system of extraterritorial application.It is necessary to use counter-sanctions legitimately,reasonably and legally.This paper will analyze the content of the United States’ Xinjiang-related sanctions based on the theoretical basis of international law,and put forward some countermeasures and suggestions in the face of the above problems combined with the current situation. |