Volleyball is a multi-person participation in the team sport,in addition to relying on the high level of competitive skills of the team members,but also need the 6 players on the field to unite,cooperate with each other,cohesion together,in order to obtain better results,and college athletes take into account the roles of "college students" and "athletes" at the same time,facing the double test of learning and training,the different positioning of the team members on their own roles may also affect the performance of the team members in training and competitions,so this article will identify with the role of high-level female volleyball players in colleges and universities and "group cohesion" status quo are investigated and comparatively analyzed,and further explore whether there is a correlation between role identity,group cohesion and competition results.This paper takes the current situation of CUVA women’s volleyball team role identity and group cohesion and its correlation analysis with competition results as the research object,and investigates 42 high-level women’s volleyball teams in colleges and universities participating in the 2019-2020 divisional competition,with a total of 504 people,through literature research method,expert interview method,questionnaire survey method,mathematical statistics method,etc.first of all,the difference analysis of the role identity and group cohesion status of CUVA female volleyball team members is carried out,and the current situation and difference of each team’s role identity and group cohesion level are understood.On this basis,the Pearson correlation analysis method is used to test the correlation between role identity,group cohesion and competition results,and try to find out whether there is a correlation between role identity,group cohesion and competition results,and analyze and summarize them,and put forward reasonable suggestions to provide reference for the development and construction of high-level women’s volleyball teams in various universities.This paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the role identity and group cohesion of high-level women’s volleyball teams in colleges and universities from multiple perspectives such as different grades,different majors,different grades,main players and substitutes,and finally concludes:1.The role recognition of high-level female volleyball players in colleges and universities is at a high level;The positive identification state of the role of college students is higher than the negative identification state.In the role identification of athletes,there were significant differences between different grades,main players and substitutes,and the freshman year was significantly higher than that of the junior year.The main team members are significantly higher than the substitute players;There were no significant differences in the other factors.In the role identification of college students,there were significant differences in the positive identity dimension of different sports level players,and the second-level team members were significantly higher than the first-level team members.2.The group cohesion of high-level women’s volleyball teams in colleges and universities is at the middle and upper level,and the attraction of group tasks and group social consistency are at a low level.Among the different factors of group cohesion,only different grades have significant differences.3.The role identification and group cohesion of athletes of high-level women’s volleyball teams in colleges and universities in the south and north regions were positively correlated,and the positive role identification of college students and group cohesion were negatively correlated.The relationship between group cohesion and competition performance of high-level women’s volleyball teams in colleges and universities in the north and south regions was significantly positive.The role identification of athletes and the positive role of college students in high-level female volleyball teams in colleges and universities in the north and south regions were not significantly weakly positively correlated with competition performance. |