| As one of the key stakeholders,farmers’ willingness and behavior to withdraw from their homestead plays a key role in the effectiveness of the reform of the separation of three rights in homestead.There are differences in the acceptance of homestead withdrawal policies among farmers with different characteristics.Exploring the impact of farmers’ feasible ability on their willingness to withdraw from homestead and the path of action can help guide farmers to voluntarily withdraw from homestead with compensation,and has certain significance for invigorating rural idle homestead,achieving optimal allocation of resources,and promoting the implementation of rural revitalization strategies.Based on this,this article takes the Xinjian District of Nanchang City,Jiangxi Province,as the research area,and conducts empirical analysis using the data collected through field research,providing a certain reference basis for the formulation of relevant policies in local and central traditional agricultural areas.Firstly,it analyzes the impact of farmers’ feasible ability on their exit intention.Based on Sen’s theory of feasible ability,indicators representing feasible ability are selected from both personal factors and their own resources,and factor analysis is used to measure feasible ability.After that,a Logit regression model was constructed to analyze the impact of farmers’ feasible ability on their exit intention using the model estimation results.Then,a multiple mediating effect model with regulation is constructed,which divides homestead values into three dimensions: homestead security,emotional,and asset values.The role of farmers’ homestead values in the relationship between farmers’ feasible ability and exit willingness,as well as the regulatory role of policy cognition,are analyzed to verify the impact of farmers’ feasible ability on homestead exit willingness and the basic path.Finally,it analyzes the generational differences in the impact of farmers’ feasible ability and homestead values on exit intention.The main conclusions are as follows:Firstly,the situation of farmers’ willingness to withdraw land is relatively optimistic.Among the influencing factors of homestead withdrawal willingness,farmers’ own level,external living environment,and policy awareness are important factors that affect farmers’ willingness to withdraw land.Secondly,the impact of farmers’ feasible ability on homestead withdrawal intention includes direct positive impact and indirect positive impact through homestead values.With the improvement of farmers’ feasible ability,their views on security and emotion of homestead will weaken,and their views on homestead assets will strengthen,which will promote farmers’ stronger willingness to withdraw from homestead.Thirdly,policy cognition plays a moderating role in the mediating effect of homestead values between farmers’ feasible ability and homestead withdrawal willingness.For farmers with a high degree of policy awareness,the impact of the concept of homestead security on the willingness to return land has been weakened,while the positive impact of the concept of homestead assets on the willingness to return land has been strengthened.Fourthly,there are generational differences in the impact of homestead values on homestead withdrawal intentions.The main manifestation is that the traditional concept of returning to the roots of fallen leaves deeply affects the older generation of farmers,making the concept of homestead security have a greater impact on their willingness to retreat;The concept of homestead assets has a greater impact on the willingness of the new generation of farmers to return land.Based on the above research conclusions,this article believes that improving farmers’ willingness to withdraw from homestead can be started by improving their own feasible ability,guiding farmers to form reasonable homestead values,and strengthening the guidance of the external policy environment,and formulating targeted policy measures for farmers across different generations to promote the withdrawal of homestead. |