Font Size: a A A

A Comparative Study Of The Policy Of The People 's Republic Of China And The People' S Republic Of China (1912-2012)

Posted on:2016-09-11Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y W MengFull Text:PDF
GTID:1106330470962975Subject:Marxism Ethnic Theory and Policy
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The introduction part, mainly involves the research background, current situation, concept definition and research scope, framework and logic, research methods, difficulties and solutions, innovation and deficiency.The first chapter mainly discusses the Tibetan policy of the Republic of china. From the overview of general Sun Zhongshan, Yuan Shikai, Jiang Jieshi’s view of nationality of the Republic of China, and the Tibetan policy discussion stage. During the period of Beijing government of the Republic of China, despite Yuan Shikai engage in authoritarian dream when the emperor, the government changed several owners, warlords fighting for territory,rampant powers the vast land of China, but the problem of Tibet never belittled, central open that sovereignty over Tibet all, the establishment of the Mongolian and Tibetan Affairsmechanism, sent a delegation to Lhasa, Sichuan and Tibet dispute mediation more carefully the principle, without losing the conference negotiations, preferential upper religious personagesJn the period of Nanjing government, "Encirclement and suppression’ The red army,to fight against the Japanese aggressors,"Stabbing outside of the first" to make the civil war endlessly, and to the border area of governance, is too busy,and has no strength to advance, there was the "Jimi policy" and "flexible policy". This period is also an eventful year in Tibet place, from the Daraiad rule to RezhenRegent,And then to Dazha Regent,swaying with the central and the Tibet of relationship, sometimes hot and sometimes cold. In this case, the central or attaches great importance to the issue of Tibet, has made great efforts to improve the relationship betweenthe Tibet and the central government, also made an active exploration for the restoration ofthe central to Tibet local authority.The second chapter mainly discusses the people’s Republic of China’s policy of the tibet. First, from the general overview, Mao Zedong,Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao of national view, then the people’s Republic of the whole Tibetan policy discussion in stages. The liberation of Tibet period, the central policy of Tibet, is the most abundant and brilliant period, Tibet is also a fundamental change in the social system, the masses of the people to obtain the complete liberation, by signing the agreement,implementation the agreement, democratic reform, realize the historical transformation of Tibet local undertakings. The construction period of Tibet, is the paper involves a broader scope, span a relatively large aspect. From 1965 to 2012, lasted for nearly half a century, and the "Cultural Revolution" special history stage. According to the characteristics of the times the central Tibetan policy, this period will be subdivided into three stages of social transformation, exploring the way,targeted aid.The third chapter mainly on the comparative study of the Republic of China and the people’s Republic of China’s Tibet policy. Through the discussion Tibetan thought of Jiang Jieshi and Mao Zedong, comparison of the two period of Tibet by discussing the ideological leader; Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission and the State Ethnic Affairs Commission to Tibetan function, comparison of the two period of Tibet by discussing thecentral mechanism; deal with the Simla meeting and signed the "Seventeen agreement", comparison of the two period central to the principle; discussing Tibet dispute mediation and disposal of the unrest in Lhasa, comparison of the two period of theTibetan policy of central; through the discussion of preparations for the Tibet conference and held a work conference in Tibet, comparison of the two period of the way; discusses a high degree of autonomy and regional autonomy for ethnic minorities, comparison the two period the central Tibetan thought, the discussion of the thirteen Darai and the fourteen Darai, comparison of the two period of central policy; set up state Lhasa primary school and founded Lhasa primary school, comparison of the two period of Tibetan cultural and educational of central policy.The fourth chapter mainly carries on the summary to the Tibetan policy of the Republic of china. The Republic of China to overthrow the monarchy as the premise, to advocate the Republic for the purpose, to follow the trend of the times, to meet the people’s wishes, the progress of history. At the same time, it is also coming from the Qing Dynasty in the shadows,a empire the imprint of the times inevitably, different, which it is also impossible to completely out of the former method and every innovation. Republic of China 38 years of rule, always is in the face of domestic trouble and foreign invasion, partly because of historical inertia,imperial habit can not be eliminated, awakening the people also need a process; on the other hand, is because the real problem, rampant powers temporarily can not be expelled, the national strength is relativelyweak.It is so in the Tibetan policy, the former experience have part of the inheritance, are also part of the innovation with the times. By her age limit, to a certain extent, often just to cope with, just stay at the surface, is a reflection of its limitations.The fifth chapter mainly carries on the summary to the whole Tibetan policy of the people’s Republic of. The people’s Republic of China period, the central Tibetan policy have two stage,the liberation of Tibet,and the construction of Tibet, the time span of 62 years, achieved Tibet’s peaceful liberation and democratic reform, people are the masters of the country, socialist transformation, reform and opening up, the long-term development, the basic stability. In such a short time, the liberation of Tibet and the masses of serfs, the transformation of the social system, make it onto the socialist road, to achieve prosperity and development of various undertakings and outstanding achievements. However, in the process of great promote the history of Tibet, in the difficult process of exploring Tibetan policy, by the large environmental impactat home and abroad, there are also some fluctuations, and even some major setbacks, such as the construction of Tibet during the period of the "Cultural Revolution", religious overheating during the period after the reform and opening up, the economy was negative growth, Lhasa has repeatedly riots, the situation that it is difficult to avoid. In spite of this, but the defects cannot obscure the virtues. In the liberation of Tibet period, the central Tibetan policy highlighted the progress, embodied in two aspects that the strategy is flexible and pay more attention to practice.In the construction period of Tibet, the central Tibetan policy have distinct characteristics of the times, is mainly reflected in two aspects that depend on external development and Insufficient of development ability.In the conclusion part, on the basis of comparative study, summarized has practical significance to the central Tibetan policy. The national strength problem is one of the most critical link of the central Tibetan policy, if the country during the war, peace of less, was to unify the realization on the surface, and even appeared to be split situation, it may be subject to others but not fully in accordance with their intention to effective governance border, also can not be achieved on reservoir sovereignty and achieve ideal effect in treatment of all reservoirs.The Republic of China is so. On the contrary, if the country during the peace, completed the unification in fact, comprehensive national strength, all countries in the world are not dare to look down, will be fully in accordance with their intention to effective governance frontier, Will also make the ideal effect of the management, stability and prosperity of Tibet,. The people’s Republic of China is so. So, to achieve the ideal effect, the central will need to concentrate on our own development and growth of their own, to enhance the comprehensive national strength.Tibet is a fundamental premise, effective treatment of reservoir will have a favorable environment. In the big environment favorable circumstances,the central Government Tibetan have great wisdom. Comparative study of the central Tibetan policy of Realistic enlightenment:first, insist on sovereignty over Tibet, perfecting the policy of governing Tibet; two, the joint governance, east-west interaction and win-win; three, give full play to its advantages, seize the opportunity of development; four, combination the internal and external policy, the joint force to ensure stable; five, jointly realiz7e the socialist modernization.
Keywords/Search Tags:the Republic of China, the people’s Republic of China, Tibetan policy, comparative study
PDF Full Text Request
Related items