The Comparative Study Of KMT And CCP Cooperative Economy Policy During The Period Of Democratic Revolution

This paper takes the dialectical materialism and the historical materialism as the basic guiding ideology, and takes the cooperative economy policy of KMT and CCP in the period of democracy revolution as the research object, the multi-disciplinary theory and research technique, such as the history, the policy study, the economics, the sociology and so on, are utilized synthetically to omni-directional carefully examine the content, the process, the sameness and difference of that two parties'cooperative economy policy. It has promulgated systematically the policy's development and evolvement rules and the effect which the policy has brought to the society and the economy of modern China, especially it is synthetically discussed about the experience and enlightening of the success and failure on the basis of contrast the policy of these two parties.This paper's contents follow:The foreword part elucidates the reasons about selecting the topic by introducing the research situation, the literature and datum and the theoretical and the practical value. At the same time, the basic mentality and the study method will be introduced, as well as this paper introduces some concepts are correlative with cooperative.The chapter one with a view to seeing about the background of the society and history, which is the basic premise for the study of the cooperative economy policy of KMT and CCP, has promulgated the reason that these two parties established the policy. The modern China in the semi-colony and semi-feudal society, the countrymen was seeking the way which solved the ruin of country economy and the modern cooperative received the favor and was introduced to china by the intellectual and nongovernmental organizations. KMT and CCP participated in the movement and selected the different cooperative ideology as the mentality foundation establishing the cooperative economy policy.The chapter two and three are established in surveying the policy contents and the practice process, which are the important content, and promulgates the cooperative economy policy rules of these two Parties. One side, it draws and comments the outline of main-body contents of these two parties'the cooperative economy policy from the lay of static policy texts, separately. On the other hand, it interprets the implementation process and the performance of these two parties from the lay of dynamic practice, separately. This analysis opens out the idiosyncrasy of the cooperative economy policy of KMT and CCP from the external to internal. The chapter four emphasizes particularly on exploring the sameness and differences in multi-lays, which is important step on the deepening the study of the cooperative economy policy of KMT and CCP, brings to light the essential of policy and the root of the different development tendency. Through the comparison of the cooperative economy policy of these two Parties,it can be seen the sameness or similarities: They all developed and supported cooperation all along; they all attached important to the country cooperation development; there policy all had the wartime characters; they all adjusted the policy according to the political situation. The differences are: the classes'property was different at all; the policy objects were widely different; the policy's maneuverability was different; these two parties attached importance to and supported the cooperative was different; the development path which these two parties selected were not same.The chapter five lies in the sum up the experiences and the lessons of the cooperative economy policy of KMT and CCP using for reference in today. The text analyze the succeed experiences of the CCP policies, the failing lessons of the KMT policies and the profundity inspire of the experiences and the lessons of these two parties'cooperative economy policy.The epilogue of the text makes summing up and analysis of the multi-layer relations which KMT and CCP dealed with in developing rural cooperation, and this part presents the conclusion of this paper.