Philology. "tube" Study

This thesis briefly summarized guanzi's produce and it's spread at the paper's beginning. The writer think that Simaqian and Bangu who lived in Han dynasty believed that guanzi was written by Guanzhong who was a great statesman in Chunqiu Dynasty. But from Han dynasty, almost in every Dynasty had scholars put up argument that the book was not written by Guanzhong himself. The most scientific deduce guanzi's written time was in last century after 50ths, one reason is that many bamboo books and books copied on silk had been emerged.This paper contrast many edition of guanzi. From bamboo books in Yinque, we could deduce that Wangbing, which was belonged to bamboo books generated latter than that of guanzi- The written books in Dunhuang could be deduced that the book was spread broadly in Tang and Song Dynasty. Though the written book was not the best edition, it could help us inferred the beginning model of the book. The category books which was written in Tang and Song Dynasty could revised the wrongly words in guanzi. We must pay attention that the category books usually written down guanzi not according their beginning test, but abbreviate them.In Song Dynasty, guanzi mainly had two editions. One of which was South Song Dynasty Zhejiang edition; another of which was South Song Dynasty Mobaotang edition, which had lost in Minguo dynasty. This paper deduced the keep and spread of the two editions, believing that Yinzhizhang's annotated guanzi was false by Fangxuanling who was a big man in Tang Dynasty which merchants did this. The mainly reason of passed down annotated guanzi was that the examination must us the book.This paper mainly argument five kinds of Ming dynasty guanzi edition, which are Liuji edition, Zhongdusizi edition, Zhaoyongxian edition, Zhuchangchun edition and Lingruheng edition. Liuji edition had much difference with Zhejiang edition, the mainly reason was that on the one side, the former had missed many sentences which the latter had been in the book; one the other side, the former had many sentences which the latter had been missed in the book. And Liuji edition had more than twenty annotates than the Song dynasty edition, which could deduce that annotates was not only one kind of matter. Zhongdusizi edition was come from Liuji edition, but it had much difference between the two books, mainly reason was that the former had more wrong words than the latter. Zhuchangchun guanzique edition had much wrong words, and we must pay more attention to this. The model of Lingruheng edition had much difference than that of the Song dynasty edition, and its words could modify the Song dynasty edition too.This paper mainly argument five kinds of Qing dynasty guanzi edition too. They are Liuji written edition, Zhaoyongxian written edition, Zhaoyongxian in Qing dynasty edition, twenty-two zilist edition, and one hundred zilist edition. Liuji written edition was much better than that of liuji edition, the mainly reason of which was that the written edition modify the wrong words in Liuji edition. Zhaoyongxian written edition modified Zhaoyongxian edition, but had some wrong words too. Twenty-two zilist edition and one hundred zilist edition was popular editions, which had modified some wrong words of Song and Ming dynasty editions. In Ming dynasty, Zhaoyongxian edition sometime use new words in placed of the old words. From that time, the tendency had been exist all the time. The writer arranges many sort of guanzi edition, try to make conclusion of the generation of guanzi edition.