Abundance To Be Neglected

The rise of under-stratum is a sign about literati responding to new social facts in time,who start introspecting the traditional image of modernization in Chinese social context,and the root literature means that this kind of introspect related to the literature realm.The purpose of this text is to call after the hidden intentions about people considering the root literature realism and what thought-tradition in back of this intention? To say further,is this the summary of esthetics style about the root literature or the theorists' definition which will be a kind of instruction to the writing about narrative-style of the root literature in advance? In addition,is the pure literature opposed to realism? If the answer is no,on which aspects the two I have mentioned are one? Which differences exist between the realism in the root literature and the one of the socialist-realism exactly? What of elegant appearance of the daily, material and rank etc.of under-stratum present in the "realism" literature is? Specifically,it is necessary that clearing up all kind of opposites of under-stratum in the different history periods and the typical social postures of under-stratum in the Chinese social context which become positive imagines gradually,the question is what's position of these postures in the previous history? Is the "poor" the moral-symbol of "under-stratum"? And is the natural contact between them a kind of imagination that suggests many complex power mechanisms? Why under-stratum is not a class,the appearance of this station is related to the history-mode of economic construction.Do the problem about the amount of under-stratum lie in the field of statistics? And which influence happened to the the root literature by these ideal-changes?Despite what this text elaborate is the living-landscape of the root literature,the essential literature-character of the root literature must be confirmed in the long history of Chinese literature.The root literature is a kind of new-emerging literature-type,but it isn't brand-new.Though people can find out many likenesses between the previous literature-forms and the root literature,the later one have not always the original factor.So no absolutely inherits and splits existed between the root literature and the anterior literatures,when analyzing,the premise conditions of conclusions is important.