Font Size: a A A

Study On The Regulation Of Administrative Monopoly In China

Posted on:2008-01-13Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:F YangFull Text:PDF
GTID:1116360215464805Subject:Political economy
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In the process of establishing and improving the socialist market economy, administrative monopoly has drawn widespread attention from all sectors of society. The study area of administrative monopoly has become one of the research frontiers of China's contemporary economics and the focus of political and economic reforms. However, the theoretical study of the problem of administrative monopoly in China has a lot of room for improvement. Both in terms of the concept and definition, and the rationality of the administrative monopoly on the discussion, there are great differences. Since the research perspective and methods and some other reasons, the issues related to the administrative monopoly have not been given a full explanation, particularly on the issue of administrative monopoly regulations. Therefore, the issues of regulation of administrative monopoly in-depth study and discussion with a strong theoretical and practical significance have been conducted in this paper.In this paper, theory and practice, combining abstract and specific research methods and comparative analysis, have been studied in regulation of administrative monopoly problems, with the theory frames of the Marxist and Western Regulatory theory, according to the market-oriented reform of China's economic transition process. Regulation of China's administrative monopoly has conducted a comprehensive and in-depth analysis and discussion so that we can promote the theory and practice of development in China's administrative monopoly regulation.The paper can be divided into four parts and the second and the third parts are the mainstays.The first part includes the first two chapters, which is the theoretical basis to the study administrative monopoly. The paper reveals the significance of the research, research methods and structure of the paper at first. Then the theories in western classical economics and Marxist economic theory of administrative monopolies and government regulation have been reviewed.The second part includes the chapter 3, 4 and 5. From the view of history of China's administrative monopoly behavior, the reason for the existence of administrative monopoly and flaws have been analysed, we can see that the administrative monopoly in the long history in China has played an important role in economic development and the stability of society. With the constant deepening of China's market economic reform, China's current stage of certain acts of administrative monopoly over a reasonable act border Because of institutional and market factors led to the social phenomenon of unfair distribution and corruption, restrictions on the normal play of the market mechanism, China has conducted the regulation reform. The system of administrative monopoly regulation, including regulation institutions, regulation content, regulation means, regulation authority and the penalties for violation of regulation, but due to various reasons led to the failure of administrative monopoly regulation.From the state of regulation of administrative monopoly in the worldwide, we summed up the experience and lessons of the reform regulation. Although the administrative monopoly is a worldwide phenomenon that is widespread, there are a lot of measures have been taken to regulated the administrative monopoly activities, such as to improve the laws and regulations adopted to guide the reform of administrative monopoly, trying to limit the negative effects of administrative monopoly. From the comparison of the regulation reform worldwide, we draw a conclusion that there is not a completely unified model in the regulation reform of the administrative monopoly.The third part is the chapter 6 and chapter 7. The conduct of administrative monopoly regulation reconstruction act to determine the borders of China's administrative monopoly in the market failure as a starting point to define the lower level of administrative monopoly and government failure as the end point to define the high level of administrative monopoly. The reconstruction of administrative monopojy system includes the regulations subjects, the main means of regulation, regulation objects and supervision system. When we conduct the reconstruction of regulation, we should pay attention the analysis of cost and profit, be strict in the scope of state-owned enterprises, strengthen regulation of e-government in the conduct of administrative monopoly, deepen the reform of the political system.The last part is the conclusion.The main conclusions and the innovations are as follows:1. Chief administrative monopoly is the main subject of the use of administrative powers to intervene and control the economy. Only the administrative authority to define the limits of legitimacy and the use of administrative monopoly, we can judge whether the scope of the abuse.2. China's current administrative monopoly behavior has been a lot of dissent, the main reason for this is the improper use of means of administrative monopoly. Or it can be said that in the exercise of reasonable administrative monopoly rights over its borders, leading to a failure of the government's regulatory system. Therefore, we must act to implement administrative monopoly regulatory reform.3. The monopolistic behavior is not a paten in China. The developed countries, developing and transition countries in their economic development at different stages have taken the measures of administrative monopoly. However, many countries have begun to reform the administrative system of monopoly regulation through improved administrative supervision mechanism and legal system to regulate the monopoly, Moreover, the regulatory system reform is to adapt to the country's socio-economic development and environment, and a unified model does not exactly exist and the solution that has been suited for one country doesn't fit for another one.4. The government should clearly define the limits of administrative monopoly behavior, market failure as a starting point to define the lower level of administrative monopoly. failure to alert the government to designate the upper limit of administrative monopoly, let the market "invisible hand" and the "visible hand" to achieve the best combination.5. China must set up an effective system of administrative monopoly regulation can be achieved by administrative monopoly function effectively. China's administrative monopoly regulations including the Regulations of the main system, the design of regulatory means, and the reconstruction of the object regulation reform Furthermore, we need to strengthen supervision of the construction of the system of administrative monopoly.
Keywords/Search Tags:administrative monopoly, market failure, government failure, regulation, reconstruction, border
PDF Full Text Request
Related items