Study On The Government Regulation In China

Management functions for education is the basic functions of a country. Private higher education is an important part of higher education, the implementation of government regulation of private higher education has a legitimate legal basis. But education is a special kind of public goods, the property requires schools to have school autonomy, if the government too much intervention, will bring a negative impact and effectiveness. China's current government regulation of private higher education are too strict, to some extent to the school as violations of autonomy, this over-regulation on the healthy development of private higher education is detrimental. Private higher education has its own characteristics, the management of private higher education the government should be distinguished from the management of Public Education.On the other hand, China's government regulation of private higher education legal system is imperfect, "Private Education Promotion Law," not implemented some provisions, private colleges and public universities is difficult to achieve equal status, which restricts the development of private higher education. Private education and public education is just the fundamental difference between the different investors, government policy-making in law should ensure the equal status. Private Higher Education in History from the Chinese point of view, the Government is to determine whether the survival and development of private universities the most critical factor. Of private higher education, the Government provided a fair policies and good institutional and legal environment has a decisive significance.Government Regulation of Private Higher Education in causing these problems mainly as the impact of profit-driven. Government regulation agencies have their own self-interest, self-interest as the driving cause of offside and the absence of regulation. Regulatory matters profitable we are rushing to do, nobody is passing the buck. Expansion of local interests and departmental interests is the underlying cause of misplaced government regulation.The second main reason is the Government's long-regulatory means of a single, simple way to create the direct administration of regulation offside; a cost to government regulation, government finances caused by too little investment in the absence of regulation.The purpose of government regulation should be two aspects, and standardize management and to encourage support. Regulation practice in China is a major problem is that they talk about standardized management, encouraging support to stay in the macro policy level, has not been effectively implemented. Tradition of Chinese Government adopted a simple "No", "approval", "punishment " such as command-control means the direct administrative management, and modern sense of the great gap between government regulation. Government regulation in the modern sense means more than "management", but also means "service"; not use coercive measures, also includes incentives, financing, support and other soft measures to encourage indirect way of achieving the purpose of macro-control, The government wants to achieve the effect, rather than the direct administrative intervention. Government Regulation of Private Higher Education should draw the United States, Japan, to reduce the direct management of the mandatory, to take financial assistance, tax incentives, information services, stimulating way.Government Regulation of Private Higher Education for the problems, the idea of reform is the simplification and optimization of government regulation. Simplify government regulation is deregulation, limited government building, the development of social self-government capacity. The key is to simplify the control of the government according to the power of community commitment to the things should have been returned to the community, government regulation of the border only in the balance of market failures, and those who do not want to control the market, can not control, to discipline, manage well the affairs of, delegation of authority to the market and society. The so-called "optimization" refers to changes in government regulation, "Offside "and"absence","dislocation" of the coexistence of an embarrassing situation, the development of scientific regulation policy. Deregulation in order to more effectively regulate, not to abolish regulation, does not mean in any way should relax regulation, regulatory reform, the ultimate goal of the optimization system. Reform of Government Regulation in China requires the existing system of regulation to optimize the design, according to the realities of social and economic development in different areas to relax regulations Fenbie, strengthen regulation and re-regulation.