1~眫Thiz ~ DOCTORAL D!SSE7~TA1 ION ABSTRACT The main questions this dissertation wants to settle include five aspects: (1) In the process of the educational development, what抯 the position of the educational institutions? What effects on the educational practice will result from the attention paid to the existing educational institutions? (2) What do the educational institutions depend on, the individual rational calculation based on one抯 own interest or some objective æ’ocial ?power independent of one抯 will? What will happen when attributing the educational institutions to a vested framework independent of one抯 educational behavior? (3) Does the educational interest background need to criticize and eliminate, or should we make public and legitimate people抯 pursuit of the educational interest under the educational institutions? Is it feasible to eliminate the background of the educational interest? (4) What抯 the nature of the transformation in the existing educational institutions? What抯 the inner impetus that brings about the institutional transformation? Which aspects are the directions of the transformation? (5) What抯 wrong with the present attentions put on the educational institutions? Which breakthroughs should be made when we want to get rid of the existing predicaments in the research? What are the characteristics of the theory that really reveals the transformation logic of the educational institutions? In order to answer these questions, based on a reflective analysis of the Old Institutional Pedagogy, this paper uses the analytic method of the New Institutional Economics for reference, brings forward an analytic framework and a concept system of the New Institutional Pedagogy to analyze the generation and the transformation of the educational institutions, educes many profitable conclusions. The whole paper is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter (æˆconomic Analysis: the Analytic Framework of the New Institutional Pedagogy?, the methodology of the paper, emphasizes the Old Institutional Pedagogy must be replaced by the New Institutional Pedagogy because of its radicalness in its analytic framework. The second chapter (æˆducational Institutions: the Most Important Educational Resources?, the general programme of the paper, holds the educational institutions are endogenous, and considers them as the most important educational resources. The next four chapters (respectively named æˆducational Institutions-in-itself: an Analysis of the Pre-institutionalized Education? æ‘nstitutionalization of the Education: the Generation of the Coercive Educational Institutions? æ…risis of the Coercive Educational Institutions: the Reversion in the Modem Times?and æŸowards Post-institutionalization: the Construction of the Free Educational Institutions?, by means of a historic analysis, try hard to reveal the logic of the generation and transformation of the educational institutions in order to provider the practical directions and theoretic model, as well as to prove the programmatic opinions concerned with the educational institutions in the second chapter. The seventh chapter, æˆpilogue: the Prospects of the New Institutional Pedagogy in China? according to the research plan, is going to review the status in quo and the trend in the future of the Institutional Pedagogy抯 development. But as a result of the time, I can only submit several trains of thought now. In addition, the third chapter mentioned before has finished already, but not submitted fully here because of the length of the paper.
|