Power, Interest And Rule

It was all kinds of academic events occurred in China' universities and colleges that have initiated social media and public's attention at present. The academic events revealed "short board" and "misconduct" of academic research and imperceptibly damaged the honor and status of the university. They are closely related between academic research and academic management. The academic management is the major function of university, the system of academic management is the basis of managing academic affairs. The voting system of academic is the academic management system with the democracy voting as the policy-making. The academic voting system empowers some of "the academic researcher" to assign the academic resources. The different kinds of rules combine the academic voting system. The main task of the academic voting system is to keep the academic justice and fairness. In some degree, the academic voting system became a tool to gain the improper benefit, which is influenced by multiple factors including the social environment, the academic atmosphere, the system itself, individual orientation and so on. The academic voting system caused the unfair result. The study about the academic voting system should take benefit as the purpose, and take power and benefit as the main points. This research will analyze the academic voting system from three dimensions such as power, benefit and rules, and based on "academic researcher".The paper proposed two independent academic concepts in the research of university academic power, the power of academic voting and the rule of academic voting. It is helpful to focus the power of academic voting and the rule of academic voting by theorists and to advance the research of the academic power. The paper also provided the referential implementation plan for the construction of the academic voting system of university. It is helpful to distinguish the boundary of academic vote, and to advance the justice and democracy of the academic voting system. It is helpful to put in order the university academic atmosphere, purify university academia. It is helpful to speed up the development of the modernization about the university academic management.The dimension of power takes the academic voting power as the object. This part studies from four aspects such as the origin of power, the operational mode, the phenomenon of disorder and the reasons in execution. The academic voting power needs the approval from the system and "academic researcher", and needs to be supervised and restricted from systems.The dimension of interest takes the factors of and non-interest as the analysis tools, analysis the relationship between the orientations of the academic voter's behavior. This part reveals the performance and the harm by some voters who pursue the improper interest. It is maintain and promote academic interest effectively that follow the systems and hold the academic conscience.The dimension of rule analyzed the details of academic voting rules under Non-standpoint angle. According to rules and regulation promulgated by government and universities, this part categorized and analyzed the academic voting rules. It revealed "the hidden rule" during the academic voting process such as the forming condition, the appearance and harm of voting trade.It is necessary of coordinating the substantive and procedural justice on pursuit of the ideal fairness of the academic voting system. Firstly, we should limit the voting power with implementing the democratic representative system of academic and carrying out the system of terms of academic voter. Secondly, we should formulate the new voting rule with implementing the rule of two-way vote, real-name vote with the majority voting system and reform the system of abstention. Finally, in order to perform the effective supervision and restriction mechanism, we should establish the academic accountability and permit laws in academic affairs.