Empirical Research On Organizational Justice Organizational Citizenship Behavior (ocb) And Job Performance

On organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors affect job performance research, academic sense to say the least, for the reality of the guidance value is also very important. Because, as the process of opening China's market, the growing spiral in the market logic to start in the history of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior and the relationship between job performance have started to appear the phenomenon of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior, work began to highlight the importance of performance impact. However, the current domestic focus for such phenomena, most remained in the general level of generalities, a fairly standard empirical research rarely.In this paper the existing literature, based on a questionnaire survey in the form of first-hand information on the acquisition, to expand the organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior and job performance of the relationship between empirical research. This paper aims to explore the Chinese culture in the context of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors affect job performance, to better understand the Chinese OCB Why the sky, the Chinese managers and provide a theoretical basis for management decisions. In both absorb and learn the basis of research results, this paper presents a more comprehensive and systematic theoretical research model.The first study of organizational justice and the direct relationship between job performance. Background of China's market-based financial company concluded that the test sample data, organizational justice and job performance exists between the more significant positive relationship. Secondly, this paper attempts to explore the organizational justice and job performance relationship can exist between the intermediate conversion mechanism factors, this, settings, and organizational citizenship behaviors examined the role of intermediate variable assumptions. Test results showed that the intermediary role of organizational citizenship behavior is relatively significant and prominent. This shows that, in the process of China's market presents a distinct stage characteristics and the market is becoming more external business environment, companies with timely adjustment of corporate strategic planning, transformation capacities.Through this theoretical and empirical research, this paper has been following conclusions and Innovation:The first is a theoretical innovation, mainly in organizational citizenship behavior on the job performance analysis and elaboration of the mechanism on. Based on equity theory and social exchange theory, organizational citizenship behavior on the job performance studies, generally there is inevitably a problem, is to organize a fair for job performance and other corporate governance mechanism is the result of what? This is by far the equity theory and the theory of social exchange theory, black box, the theoretical system which are not given the system's answers and explanations. According to mentioned above, equity theory and social exchange theory, many researchers in the organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior and job performance characteristics of the three aspects of the scene on the equity theory and social exchange theory framework for improving the system, but still not living in organizational justice and job performance and other management mechanism of action between the results in depth of touch. This chapter based on the relationship between organizational justice and job performance of the existing research literature on organizational justice and job performance relationship between the mechanism of a boldly exploratory analysis and summary to explain the mechanism of organizational citizenship behavior factors among the mechanism of action. Paradigm in the theory, breaking the traditional limitations of a single theoretical paradigm. Usually only a single theoretical paradigm of the organization from a perspective of justice and organizational citizenship behavior and job performance to explain some aspect of organization citizenship behavior as an emerging phenomenon of complex organizational behavior, the interpretation of any single perspective is not justified, so the model based on a single theoretical paradigm has a strong although the demands of power, but its value is also very obvious limitations. Therefore, this article in the integration of equity theory and social exchange theory, based on building a comprehensive model to a comprehensive, systematic analysis of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behavior and work performance impact mechanism, the theoretical model than ever richer, more comprehensive.Followed by the theoretical research model of innovation. Relative to the equity theory and social exchange theory on organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior and job performance relationship between the existing research, this theoretical research model, organizational justice is not only concerned about the direct relationship with job performance, organizational justice is also concerned about the living relationship with job performance the role of intermediary between the variables, as well as from the nature of financial enterprises, financial firm size and financial variables such as business development stage of organizational justice and job performance for the relationship between effect. There has been research in this paper builds on an integration of organizational citizenship behavior framework, from the perspective of organizational citizenship behavior of the "organizational justice," the important features of variable and the correlation between job performance. From the perspective of a comprehensive study of organizational justice intermediary role of organizational citizenship behavior, organizational citizenship behavior in the organizational justice and job performance in the role of intermediary between the previous study has not been verified, therefore, organizational citizenship behavior in the organizational justice and job performance of between the role, the role of the relationship between the three is not a complete study.In this study, organizational justice and social exchange theory, the integration of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior in the intermediary role between job performance and ultimately the path of their combined effect gives a clear explanation. Overall, the theoretical study of this model, some research findings are not new, but this paper does not focus on a single concept, but to provide information on organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior and job performance of a more comprehensive research model.Once again, research perspectives on innovation. This expansion from the perspective of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behavior issues. Through the integration of organizational citizenship behavior and job performance in the literature, this study constructed a theoretical model to the system of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior and job performance. By building and testing the model, this study of organizational citizenship behavior as a factor affecting job performance of an important mediating factors. Context of deepening the Chinese understanding of organizational citizenship behavior, organizational justice verified organizational citizenship behavior and work performance of an important influence. In the past literature and research, scholars have different perspectives, respectively, from research and analysis organization that may affect the fairness of organizational citizenship behavior and work performance of internal and external factors, including external environmental factors, enterprise-level features and management for the influence behavior. Unlike previous studies, this article in the current study based on the results, try from financial companies in the organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors affect job performance for the study, from the organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior and job performance perspective, the relationship among the factors that may affect the impact and possible relationship, into a research model for analysis, resulting in possible research perspectives on innovation.Finally, the level of innovation from the analysis. In this study, enriched the social exchange theory, equity theory and analysis level. In the analysis level, the traditional theory in the absence of the intermediary role of organizational citizenship behavior problems, both social exchange theory, equity theory and research perspective, most of the organizational citizenship behavior as an independent variable or manipulated variable to explore its influence on job performance, does not take into account the impact of its role as an intermediary variable, and no study of organizational justice in organizational citizenship behaviors impact on job performance in the role. This study has greatly expanded the field of organizational behavior organizational citizenship behavior issues. Many scholars study the various organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior and the relationship between job performance, but the organizational citizenship behavior in the relationship between organizational justice and job performance in the role of foreign scholars is currently being actively explored, at home or a not yet fully field of study.In this study, combined with some successful financial business case and questionnaire research, that organizational citizenship behavior on financial firms has an important impact on work performance and organizational citizenship behavior discussed in the impact of organizational justice on the job performance of an important role. Understanding of organizational citizenship behavior is to understand the financial performance of enterprises is an important part. Analysis of levels of refinement enrich and expand the social exchange theory, equity theory and research areas.