The Comparation Of Korean And Chinese’s Multi-Adverbial Conjunction Word Order

The subject mainly studies the multi-adverbial conjunction word order to sort out on the basis of comparative analysis from the Typology of the Korean and Chinese languages. The paper is divided into eight chapters.The first chapter is to explain the significance, method and theory of the multi-adverbial conjunction word order of Korean and Chinese, Research of word order type for this paper can be provided to the fullest extent, a detailed description and analysis of the multi-layer adverbial conjunction word order of Korean and Chinese can also provide a theoretical basis and methodological guidance. Theories of cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics can be fully explained to provide a theoretical basis in the full description on the basis of this paper.The second chapter is mainly studying the syntactic features and semantic categories of the multi-layer adverbial conjunction word order of Korean and Chinese. Korean and Chinese adverbial as a predicate state show the freedom, liberty, or semi-free three cases. Korean and Chinese adverbial use characteristics according to the syntax, semantics, pragmatics, which are divided into peripheral adverbial in Korean and Chinese language and inherent adverbial; The inherent adverbial is divided into to commentary adverbial restrictive adverbial and descriptive adverbial. Korean and Chinese adverbial constituent elements are divided into thematic adverbial and thematic adverbial.The Third Chapter comparatively analyses the similarities and differences of the multilayer peripheral traits of language used in conjunction word order in Korean and Chinese. The external traits of Korean and Chinese language resist in the syntactic position before the subject, showing a semantically [+association][+commentary][+limit] semantic features. And the elements of them are divided into thematic adverbial and non-thematic adverbial. Overall, The language used in conjunction word order of Korean and Chinese multi-layer peripheral characters rendered as [+Associate]>[+commentary])[+limit] in the semantics; The Korean and Chinese multi-layer adverbial conjunction word order non-thematic adverbial in a thematic adverbial. Korean [+concerned] adverbial is attributed to the inherent traits language, Chinese [+concerned] adverbial is attributed to the peripheral traits language.The Fourth Chapter main discuss the comparative analysis of the similarities and differences of the Korean and Chinese multilayer intrinsic adverbial language used in conjunction word order. The word order of the language used in conjunction to the inherent adverbials of the Korean multi-layer, restrictive adverbial> complement adverbial> descriptive adverbial; the conjunction of the word order of Chinese multi-layer inner adverbials is restrictive adverbial) descriptive adverbial) complement adverbial. The Korean complement adverbial exists in before the predicate. Meanwhile, the Chinese complement adverbial can also exist after the predicate. The Korean auxiliary verb does not occupy the adverbial position, existing in the predicate, can be used in conjunction; But Chinese auxiliary occupies the position of the adverbial, after existing in the subject before the predicate, and can be used in conjunction.The Fifth Chapter discusses the similarities and differences of the multilayer thematic adverbial conjunction word order in Korean and Chinese. Once a Korean multi-layer of thematic adverbial word order is:[+causes] thematic adverbial)[+conditions] thematic adverbial)[+when and where] thematic adverbial)[physical] thematic adverbial [+object] thematic adverbial; But the Chinese multi-layer of thematic word order is:[+causes] thematic adverbial>[+conditions] thematic adverbial>[+concerned] thematic adverbial)[+when and where] thematic adverbial)[+physical] thematic adverbial)[+object] thematic adverbial. Korean [+concerned] thematic adverbial is attributed to the inherent traits language, Chinese [+concerned] thematic adverbial is attributed to the peripheral traits language.The Sixth Chapter comparatively analyses the multi-storey adjunct conjunction word order of the similarities and differences between Korean and Chinese. The multilayer adjunct of the conjunction word order of Korean and Chinese is the correlation adverb>commentary adverb>restrictive adverb) descriptive adverb. The negative adverb closest to the predicate in Korean, Chinese negative adverb is shifting with the negation domain. The Seventh Chapter mainly analyses the Chinese multi-layer word order used in conjunction complement and which they are the counterpart in Korean language. To further validate the complement of the Chinese, like adverbial downgrade above that component, which is a predicate complement component, it corresponds to the Korean adverbial predicate.The Eighth Chapter is the conclusion, mainly to explain the subject and the basic work, innovation and inadequacies.