Study On Innovation Of Social Governance Patterns In View Of Modern Governance

This paper is based on the perspective of modern governance and combing western management theory and governance experience.The governance model innovation of Shunde, Guangdong Province, Ningbo of Zhejiang Province and Shandong Xintai is selected as the object of study. By using empirical research methods, features and value of 3 social governance innovation are studied intensively. The paper is concerned with how to enhance and innovate the current and later theoretical and practical issues of our social governance.The introduction focuses on the Background of the choice:Currently great importance is attached to social governance innovation from the central to the local authorities, and much beneficial exploration is made from theory to practice. Under the new situation, our society meets a series of difficulties and problems in the process from management to governance, which requires that we use innovative thinking and means to strengthen work in this regard,actively maintain social harmony and stability, and promote scientific development of economy and society. Next, the theoretical and practical significance of the paper are analyzed. Finally the evidence-based research method combined with multi-means is introduced, which is the innovation of the paper.Chapter 1 focuses on the analysis of governance modernization as the theoretical research framework of the country’s governance model innovation:Firstly, discern and define core concepts such as the governance, social governance, social governance mode and so on. And secondly interpret the governance modernization and national governance systems modernization and the meaning to governance capacity modern, and comb the relationship between the national system of governance and national governance capacity. Finally analyze the guiding of the governance modernization to social governance innovation.Chapter 2 presents an analysis of the theoretical basis of this paper:Firstly, the thinking of Marxist social governance is stated, after which Mao Zedong’s social governance thinking in the Chinese period of socialist construction and social governance thinking theory of socialism with Chinese characteristics are discussed. Secondly, the emergence and development of the governance theories are analyzed from three aspects, the first of which is the rise and applications of western management theory, the second is defining the difficulties of governance theory in the development of China’s plight according to the central and western variance analysis, and the third is to develop social mode of governance of innovation which is based on contemporary practice in China, and to learn from the western. Finally, recall the ancient Chinese social governance of the ideology and practice, and dig the its modern governance value; and, finally analyze the guiding of the "national system of governance and governance capacity modernization" in social governance innovation, and fully understand and grasp the concept of "social governance" to form the Chinese character of "social governance" theory.Chapter 3 studies the development track of our social management and social governance since the founding of People’s Republic of China. This chapter analyzes institutional evolution in the social management and social governance areas from the founding to today, focuses on the development of New China’s social management and social system of governance and practice and analyzes the current problems and their causes that social management and social governance are facing. In this chapter 60 years of social management and social development is divided into 5 stages. The first stage is from 1949 to 1957, which is from the founding to the early transformation of the "old" and the building of a new society, whose major task is to stabilize and consolidate the political power. Stage2 is from 1958 to 1977, when a socialist social management system was set up to match the command of planned economy. The initial social management system was established, which is characterized by social management commanded by the Government to configure resources under the planned system, and the community is the "lower" of Government. The third stage is from 1978 to 1992, which is the beginning of China’s reform and opening up, Mrs town government social management mode left from the planned economy system is facing a growing challenge. The social governance apparently does not adapt and adjust the process of groping. The fourth stage is from 1993 to 2002.The 14th session of the National People’s Congress established in 1992 established the objectives of the reform of system of socialist market economy, which affected the transformation of social management system. The government redistribution functions were weakening, the social governance system construction lagged behind the phenomenon of social and economic development. The fifth stage is from 2003 till now. Along with the basic establishment and perfecting of the socialist market economy system, social management and social governance in our country entered a new development stage. The reform deepened in the field of social management. Social distinction and social fairness problems were increasingly prominent. The new system of a party, government, enterprises, social organizations and individual citizens to participate in social governance together is being built.Chapter 4 takes the innovation and pilot work of the social governance of Shunde in Gongdong province, Ningbo in Zhexiang province, Xintai in Shandong province as research objects, which explains the background, guiding principles and objectives of the innovation of social governance and analyzes the achieved stage results and problems of the social governance.Through the reform of powers and the administrative examination and approval system such as "the super-ministries reform" and "simple policy, strong town", Shunde of Guangdong province formed a "declarative rules" pattern of local social governance model. The essence is limited refactoring of structure of the governance. The historical position is that it is the intermediary agent of the "property right reform" and the "regime reform". The practical significance not only lies in the breaking of the institutional barriers to achieve economic and social transformation of Shunde, but provides the demonstration sample for the deepened reform and explores a reform route from "property right reform" to "reform of sovereignty".Ningbo of Zhejiang province, as the starting area of the market economy in our country and the leading edge opening to the outside world, after years of efforts, created the unique local social governance model in the field of social governance, which was famous for the 81890 public information service platform and realized "interaction of the people and the administration" through the method of "the government playing, market operation, and society participation". That means the government burdens the operating costs of 81890 public platform, sets up service carrier, is responsible for the planning, organization, coordination and supervision of the public service, and provides a full range, all-weather, the whole program of services free of charge for citizens and enterprises; however, the enterprises, volunteers, non-profit organizations and government agencies are responsible for service supply. Ningbo gradually broke through the traditional management ideas, formed the demand and problem oriented social governance concept which was characterized by the participation in society, opened up a new vision of social governance, and added the power of reason for social governance.Xintai of Shandong province gradually groped and created the "cooperation and common-governing" local social governance model, which needed the cooperation of government and social organizations. Xintai established social management service center,which was supported by the community grid management. Inside the system integrated management department implemented integrated office. Outside the system, peace association and social forces established the interactive working mechanism, which formed a new pattern of interaction of the government management service and social organization self management service under the leadership of the Party, and promoted social harmonious development of good governance and peace.The innovation cases of the social governance model above three areas reflect five innovative characteristics of the current social governance model in our country, that is, the main body of social governance transforms from "single" to "pluralism"; the direction of social governance from "single" to "interaction"; the essence of social governance from "authority" to "separation of powers"; the idea of social governance from "tradition" to "modern"; and the method of social governance from "rule of man" to "rule of law".Chapter 5 analyzes of the practice of social governance in United States, Singapore, the United Kingdom and Hong Kong, China, and other countries and regions and its implications for China. For example, in the United States corporate governance is based on a government process reengineering, and intermediary organizations in society are actively cultivated, which fully have the power of social participation, inspire people’s enthusiasm for participation, and form social and civic engagement of the political and social relations; Singapore’s social governance is people-oriented, which aims to be strictly in accordance with the laws and regulations, build a clean, efficient, and service-oriented government, and enable seamless management of society through a modern e-government platform; in the United Kingdom as a representative of the Western European countries, through the numerous reforms of the Government, decentralization and devolution of power and authority are achieved step by step, which fully mobilize the enthusiasm of local governments, community organizations, non-profit organizations and citizens, inspire vitality of the market, and form a social governance of the plurality in the area; and in Hong Kong since the handover,the traditional government-dominated social governance has been changed into social-based social governance, whose functions of the Government are limited to the social services, which are market-oriented and customer-oriented, and insist on public satisfaction as its principle and guiding the community organizations to be involved in social governance and to establish the governance mode of the "small government, big community and big market".For this reason, it is important to draw on the experience of Western governance, push forward our country’s social governance innovation, and increase levels and capacity of government management.Chapter 6, based on the case studies, infers the path selection of social governance in our country with a certain universal significance of enhancing and innovation. That means, we should seek good governance with the rule of law thinking and service concept, construct a open and transparent, responsive and responsible government, transform from controlled by the government to diverse cooperation work, reshape the grass-roots power structure and improve the ability of the society to govern itself, change passive service to active service specification, and take the customer as the center to reengineer the social governance process.