On The Pursuit Of Marx’s National Thought

Marx’s early university stages of learning and leaving on the initial society not onlyaccepted Hegel’s philosophy, but accepted the Western intellectual heritage of the country asa good idea. Struck in the “Rhine daily” realistic criticism work period, Marx opened adifficult transformation of philosophy and outlook of the state, realized the preliminary twistin Keluocinahe period, he began to move toward socialism and communism. In Paris period,Marx started to lay the theoretical foundation for socialism, communism, and class analysis,initially revealed the class nature of the state and national autonomy. In Brussels time, Marxproposed historical materialism and the framework of its interpretation, and began to studyand interpret the economic foundation, civil society, ideology and national issues inaccordance with the framework, thus revealing a more comprehensive class nature of thestate and national autonomy. From February1848, the French Revolution, to1864, beforethe establishment of the International Workers Association, through the analysis of thehistory and reality of many countries in the application of historical materialism, Marxdeveloped his national ideology：withering away of the state is gradual, autocratic rule stemsfrom social development problems, the best form of the state is the one without hiding socialcontradictions, state power should be unified, legislative should be higher thanadministrative power, local autonomy has vitality, political parties and political activities onbehalf of the organizers of class interests, elections and the right to vote have importantpolitical value and the dictatorship of the proletariat. After the establishment of theInternational Workers Association, Marx not only in "Das Kapital" in the role of the Statemade a dialectical investigation, but also in the "Civil War in France" in the experience ofthe Paris Commune made a summary of the country to return to society, in the "Critique ofthe Gotha Program "Research presented in proposition national system of communist society,in the" anthropological notes "in the country of origin was further studied. These showMarx’s better understanding of the country and are likely to be completely summarized. Marx is in the case of national disillusionment toward socialism. Marx’s socialism isindividualism, nationalism corresponding, to abandon individualism, nationalism, socialism,its core is the achievement of universal human freedom. Marx said the country is sometimesreferred to as substance countries, sometimes as a political community, sometimes as thestate system and state government agencies as required under the system, it is necessary todetermine the specific meaning of the text. But overall, the state only on the materialism ofMarx’s thought to explain the framework in order to get a better understanding.Interpretation of historical materialism theory framework consists of two interrelatedsystems: the productive forces and production relations are based on the mode of productionas the intermediary and interconnected and interacting; economic base and the superstructureis in the form of mediation and communication linkages and interactions. The state ismainly explained through the framework of the superstructure, which the civil society inparticular as an intermediary class, dominated not only by economic fundamentals, but alsodominated the economic base; both dominated by the ruling class, and in each class and theruling conducted among all sectors of the regulation of class; the state is a necessary evil inimmature social condition, while it is in its own mature society especially when the class isbound to perish demise. The State function scope is also associated with social developmentstatus. Demise of the state’s process is gradual. State means the demise of state power, ratherthan the demise of the national system. Distinguish the only national essence and state formof the national thought, there is no distinction between constitution and regime. Thedistinction between constitution and regime is a misreading of Marx’s national thought.Marx’s dictatorship of the proletariat and the proletarian democracy are two concepts whichshould not be confused. The dictatorship of the proletariat is neither violent repression norproletarian democracy, it simply refers to the proletariat in control of state power, its purposeis to create the conditions for the transformation of the private ownership of the means ofproduction, which is only transitional.Marx although some bourgeois political system andmechanisms founded in the growth process has many critics, but mainly from the bourgeoisvirtue of their strong grasp of economic resources and mechanisms to take advantage ofthese systems made for their benefit services criticism, instead of criticizing forms of thesesystems and mechanisms.Marx thought of the state still has a great significance in today’s historical conditions. Of course, Marx thought of the state also needs to be developed in the new reality. To adhereto and develop Marxist theory of the state, first of all, we must adhere to Marx’s historicalmaterialism, materialism to explain the system to study the use of our political reality.Second is the use of existing in the thought of Marx thoughts of the state resources to thedevelopment of Marx thought of state combined with reality. The third is to absorb foreignMarx nationalists and non-Marx nationalist countries research results to develop Marxisttheory of the state.