Research On Performance Assessment System Of Large-scale Public Project

In recent years, governments at all levels in our country generally reinforced the investment efforts in large-scale public construction projects, while this particularly play a more and more important role in the development of social society and economic development. Yet with the accelerated speed of large-scale public construction project investment, the economic growth is promoted effectively, whereas some problems also appear and can not be overlooked, such as undesirable investment performance, low-level and repeated construction, neglect of monitoring of environmental pollution appropriation of capital, corruption and so on. There are diversified reasons for these problems, however, from the perspective of Public Management and Management Science, the reasons are mainly including the following two facets:firstly, lack of a comprehensive quantitative index system to scientifically and reasonably measure the performance of large-scale public construction project and the performance assessment method thereof under the sustainable development mode; secondly, lack of quantitative analysis on the key factors which influence the performance of large-scale public projects. Therefore, in order to better display the benefit of large-scale public project investment, we should be innovative in building the performance assessment theories, assessment system, assessment index, and assessment method, quantitatively analyze the key factors influencing the performance of large-scale public projects, consummate the performance assessment system of large-scale public construction project, so as to better promote the development of large-scale public project construction in our country.Based on full digestion of the latest foreign and domestic researches on assessment index and methods for large-scale public project performance, with integration of the sustainable development theory, the stakeholder’s theory and the performance assessment theory, a creative research is performed here following building the assessment index system for performance assessment of large-scale public projects firstly.Then paper studied the performance assessment model of large-scale public projects and quantitatively analyzed the factors influencing the performance of large-scale public projects. At last the paper gave political suggestions to enhancement of large-scale public project performance. Focusing on the design of large-scale public project performance assessment index system, this paper summarizes the precious ordinary performance assessment index system for public projects. Processing from the agency relationship of large-scale public construction projects and its operation logics of its performance, based on the design principles of performance assessment index and the features of large-scale public construction project, a practical and dynamic public project performance assessment index system with common significance is built from the following three visual angles:the four performance modules of large-scale public projects including project investment, project process, project output, and project influence, project life circle including project decision-making stage, project implementation stage, project operation stage, and sustainable development mode of projects. Then through literature review, the indices are complied and selected. After that, the author consults to the experts to further improve and correct the index system, finally the lack of comprehensiveness and integrity of the existing assessment index system are avoided.Focusing on the selection of comprehensive assessment method of large-scale public project performance, this paper tries to apply inproved D-S evidence theory and fuzzy mathematics to performance assessment of large-scale public projects. Through establishment of assessment mode with multiple-index performance parameters, by using Mass function in evidence theory for calculation and integration for assessment, and expression of the performance assessment result by quantitative levels, the errors caused by experts’objective assessment is avoided accordingly. At the same time, the data also take the representativeness and generality into consideration. Therefore, a large-scale public project in Hunan Province is selected as example. Computer programs are compiled in order to adopt computer for standardized assessment.Regarding the quantitatively analysis of the factors influencing the performance of large-scale public projects, this paper makes full use of information related to public project performance under sustainable development mode, and firstly qualitatively analyzes the factors which may influence the large-scale public project performance assessment. By using SPSS13.0software, a descriptive statistics result of the questionnaire data is performed by using SPSS13.0software, and the five key factors influence the large-scale public project performance assessment are identified: project management,project governance,manager quality,risk distribution, and external environment. Then by using AMOS17.0and SPSS13.0, structure equation model analysis of the five major factors are analyzed, through quantitative analysis, the path coefficient of this theoretic mode is acquired, while it is proved that the five factors project management, project governance, manager quality, risk distribution, and external environment take significant impact on the performance of large-scale public projects, which helps to find the entry point of future performance assessment of large-scale public project.Focusing on the phenomenon that though the governments in our country implements assessment of large-scale public projects preliminarily, there is a shortage of detailed analysis and effective interpretation of performance assessment result, this paper combines the research results with the control theory and information theory with an attempt to build effective assessment mechanism. Through these research results, some effective suggestions are offered for the methodological interpretation of performance assessment result by the government and the improvement of large-scale public project performance.