Reorientation Of Husseil’s Theory Of Intersubjectivity

This paper intends to study the intersubjectivity contained in Husserl publishedand unpublished writings, to break through trivial processing which has been used inthe theory of intersubjectivity. Intersubjectivity not only reflects the dilemma of thesubject philosophy.We consider the intersubjectivity as a basic and prospectiveconcept in the philosophical theory.After analyzing Husserl’s intersubjectivity, intersubjectivity is not only hisresurrection of Descartes’s philosophical motivation, that is, success and failure oftranscendental philosophy, but also analysis of intentionality committed to Other andsubject community structure in the transcendental ego construction. By means ofanalysing,the strange experience, Husserl tried to surpass the transcendentalphenomenology solipsism, in order to find the objective basis of world knowledge inthe transcendental intersubjectivity. In addition, he also tries to interpret the essence ofthe society transcendentally from the theory of intersubjectivity. Therefore, in theinterpretation of intersubjectivity, I will focus on the transcendental subjectcommunity, because it is such a problem in itself has the objective understanding ofthe world in epistemological sense and the social ontology sense of socialtranscendental significance. What’s more, underlying meaning will be exposed afterthe analysis. With the introduction of the late Husserl and phenomenological analysisof history, culture, life world opened another door for the theory of intersubjectivity,life world is given as a value field. Analysis of intersubjective in epistemology hasgradually shifted to the analysis of ontology and value.In this paper, the Husserl’s intersubjectivity is distinguished into two partsaccording to its thought development and the theoretical relevance in the systemIntroduction “The important value and related literature of Husserl’sintersubjectivity ",focuses on Husserl’s thought development, How intersubjectivity developed from the occurrence, development to the final establishment. Thisdescription is to simply explains the theory of intersubjectivity is not only a reflectionon modern European subjectivity in philosophical understanding, but also thereflection of Husserl’s life. Especially through the establishment of starting point,writing this paper logical thinking and to achieve the ultimate goal based on theprevious criticism.The first chapter "From Descriptive to Transcendental phenomenology", brieflyintroduces the phenomenology and Husserl’s thought outline. At the same time, thechaper concentrate on his philosophical category in his early period and focus on thelogical connection between these ideas, especially the relationship between his laterthoughts and earlier thoughts.The pursuit of absolute truth makes Husserl give up hisearly standpoint of empirical psychology and enter essence of phenomenology. Hegive up empirical psychology with relativism of colors, and turn to the transcendentalphenomenology, in this process, intersubjectivity enters into Husserl’s perspective.The second chapter "The Presence and Clarification of intersubjectivity ",elaborates Intersubjectivity of experience before "reduction theory".During thisperiod, the study of Lipps and Dilthey’s empathy theory, we will discuss theintersubjectivity from naturalistic attitude and personality attitude We will study"Logical Investigations ","Ideas I" and "Ideas II"The third chapter "The Intersubjectivity of Cartesian Meditations" focuses onHusserl’s the "fifth meditation" in terms of the strange experience intentionalityanalysis, including others, that is the analysis on strange body structure, theobjective world. I focus on structural problems in the transcendental subjectcommunity, because it is the objectivity of this problem in itself together withHusserl’s intersubjective theory to solve the objectivity of the world and thetranscendental meaning of the society. But, the possibility of the transcendentalsubject community into the transcendental intersubjectivity became Husserl’s"Waterloo", because the constructed community in my transcendental consciousnessis the ultimate object, which is the main object of the community, the community isdeprived of the object structure of community capacity. So, in order to understand its structure in the strict sense of the transcendental subject, the ultimate source of allexistence and the significance of the thought, as I must stay away from all possiblecommunity. The result is "I" back to the starting point of the loneliness, Therefore,Husserl’s transcendental philosophy will have to face the solipsism dilemma.The fourth chapter "Intersubjectivity and Evidence and Intuition", although "fifthmeditation" has been regarded as a model of transcendental intersubjectivity theory ofHusserl’s work, Husserl also once thought that it provides satisfactory information onthe intersujectivity, after “meditations”,intersubjectivity still plagued Husserl, untilhis death, Husserl has not given up his study on intersubjectivity and make thisproblem more reasonable, more hopeful. So in order to understand Husserl’sintersubjectivity,I will summarize Husserl’s thought of intersubjectivity in the fourthchapter. Genetic phenomenology will make intersubjectivity devepoment.The fifth chapter "Intersubjectivity and Genetic Phenomenology”focus on studyof empathy of intersubjectivity and genetic phenomenology., before introducinggenetic phenomenology, Husserl’s phenomenological method is not completed, thefinal expression of Cartesian thought is not Husserl. Through the dynamic analysis,we can see a different Husserl. This chapter also can be regarded as a summary of theresponses to the second chapter.The sixth chapter of "intersubjectivity and lifeworld" focuses on reduction ofintersubjectivity, or double reduction, and study intersubjectivity and life world in"the Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology".